Dids
Well-known member
- First Name
- Les
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2019
- Threads
- 10
- Messages
- 1,792
- Reaction score
- 3,820
- Location
- Massachusetts
- Vehicles
- 04 Tacoma, 23 Cybertruck
- Occupation
- Self
Ok Bogan, I forgive your people for sending us Rupert.The next question there is who is the "right" entity to stop it at all, and next who can be persuaded to turn off the money tap in a proxy war? Too many on both sides profiteering from someone elses suffering and conflict.
It's not like it was a particularly popular move in Russia either. Ideally, local support for conflict will falter on all sides, on both sides of the conflict and third party supporters. But that doesn't mean the "goodies" have won, if at all there was such a side to begin with.
From my perspective the question should be how to change things to make the future work, together. By initially forgiving eachother how we got here for a time, to implement the changes, and then only remembering it to avoid conflict again, and implementing more change as a remedy. Reiterative peace process.
You can't change history, if history is true or not, justified or not. You can only choose today to change the outcome of the future.
But people can only adopt change over time, some take longer, some shorter, so you need to allow time to heal, using each healed scar as a marker for what not to do again.
Sponsored