dalton108
Well-known member
- First Name
- Dalton
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2020
- Threads
- 132
- Messages
- 3,966
- Reaction score
- 7,912
- Location
- USA
- Vehicles
- ā24 FS/CB; ā24 MX; ā23 MS PLAID (Prior: ā20-MY; ā21-M3P) (Also: ā14-FJ; ā21-C8)
- Occupation
- Lawyer
- Thread starter
- #31
āForce Majeure.ā Reasonableness becomes generally irrelevant.What's reasonable care? Are you a Toyota dealer in a quiet town with no enemies? Then they likely took reasonable care.
Are you a highly targeted company with a rash of recent arsons, vandalisms, and gunfire at your properties? I would question if their measures rose to the level of "reasonable care" for the climate they're in. Nevada law requires measures a "prudent business" would take to protect property, there's a case to be made that knowing the elevated threat level, they didn't provide that level of protection. I would totally hire you to make that case for me.
But, I'm willing to bet Tesla will get insurance to cover, or give out of pocket "good will" replacements for all the vehicles involved. Last thing they need is a bunch of customers going public saying they're suing Tesla because Tesla told them, "good luck with your insurance!". How many would feel unsafe bringing their Tesla in for service or repairs after that, with what, one or two service center attacks a week now?
Sponsored