Sponsored

2nd PCS2 failure

PungoteagueDave

Well-known member
First Name
David
Joined
Mar 2, 2025
Threads
2
Messages
939
Reaction score
1,023
Location
Boynton Beach
Vehicles
‘25 Tesla Cybertruck, ‘26 Tesla MY Launch, ‘13 Porsche C4S, ‘26 BMW R1300 GSA
Occupation
retired
Country flag
Isn’t this likely due to your first issue being a very early failure before the updated parts or PCS failures even trending (1.5-2 years ago)? So this shouldn’t be interpreted as a continuing risk for those who have replaced their PCS in recent months, which seems to be the majority of cases?
Sponsored

 

gooshjkc

Well-known member
First Name
Jasper
Joined
Mar 21, 2024
Threads
12
Messages
239
Reaction score
342
Location
Atlanta, GA
Vehicles
MB EQS SUV 580
Occupation
Real Estate
Country flag
I just had my replaced. So far so good. However, reading this post is giving anxiety that it might happen again. Ugh!!! Tesla really need to address this and not just put a band-aid on it.
 

Vagis9780

Well-known member
First Name
David
Joined
Jan 25, 2021
Threads
10
Messages
194
Reaction score
202
Location
Louisiana
Vehicles
Cyber Truck
Occupation
Retired
Country flag
Welp, just got my 2nd PCS2 failure. At least this time I still have 24amp AC charging unlike last time where it shut the whole truck down. :/ SC says backlog is still really long.

Edit: 30k miles and almost 2 years of ownership. First failure was on day 3 of ownership at 500 miles.

My guess the PSC is the on board inverter required to take your home 120v AC electric and invert to DC voltage to required to charge battery,(unlike Supercharger which charges DC to DC). I also assume CT PSC is also used to power 48v systems and why we are NOT seeing PSC failures on other Tesla vehicles.
 

SCTesla

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 11, 2024
Threads
6
Messages
2,480
Reaction score
3,693
Location
USA
Vehicles
22 Model S, 24 CT
Country flag
Isn’t this likely due to your first issue being a very early failure before the updated parts or PCS failures even trending (1.5-2 years ago)? So this shouldn’t be interpreted as a continuing risk for those who have replaced their PCS in recent months, which seems to be the majority of cases?
I was told they are working on a new revision and that's what I am waiting for.
 

gooshjkc

Well-known member
First Name
Jasper
Joined
Mar 21, 2024
Threads
12
Messages
239
Reaction score
342
Location
Atlanta, GA
Vehicles
MB EQS SUV 580
Occupation
Real Estate
Country flag
I was told they are working on a new revision and that's what I am waiting for.
That’s all good and dandy. However, are they going to recall every CT and replace them for free or we going to have to cough up the dough to do it. Especially for the ones that the warranty is over.
 


SCTesla

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 11, 2024
Threads
6
Messages
2,480
Reaction score
3,693
Location
USA
Vehicles
22 Model S, 24 CT
Country flag
That’s all good and dandy. However, are they going to recall every CT and replace them for free or we going to have to cough up the dough to do it. Especially for the ones that the warranty is over.
There isn't a recall currently. It's hard to say.

They've automated a lot of the process now as they are so common. It automatically gives you free Supercharging once the self check fails.
 

JackCypher

Well-known member
First Name
Jack
Joined
Jun 13, 2024
Threads
2
Messages
324
Reaction score
425
Location
California
Vehicles
Cybertruck Foundation
Occupation
CEO
Country flag
I have experience in high power / energy systems, electronics. The components for the PCS are quite well rated and understood by the supplier - so failures are rarely from component lot variation. It is clear to me the circuit design is not sufficient.

AC has an additional challenge in that the current flows in both directions. This can cause tremendous stress on components unless the circuit is design to protect against that. Your washer and dyer for example use special AC 'Zero crossing' relays - which only switch when the AC current swings to zero. If you used a normal relay - it would burn out in only a few 100 cycles.

Also the PCS is apparently design to handle both DC and AC high power - which you would normally avoid as they complexity of AC or DC presents their own unique design challenges at PCS power levels.
 

devdrone6

Well-known member
First Name
Dev
Joined
Aug 28, 2024
Threads
27
Messages
1,018
Reaction score
2,139
Location
Nebraska
Vehicles
Cybertruck, 2023 Model Y
Country flag
That’s all good and dandy. However, are they going to recall every CT and replace them for free or we going to have to cough up the dough to do it. Especially for the ones that the warranty is over.
The answer is No and Yes. Several cases here where tesla did compensate out of warranty trucks, not the full amount but a good chunk of it. Not ideal, but better than nothing.

I have the G version so hope that lasts 👍
 


Ranger George

Well-known member
First Name
George
Joined
Apr 26, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
69
Reaction score
108
Location
Hawaii Island
Vehicles
Cybertruck
Occupation
Ranger
Country flag
I have experience in high power / energy systems, electronics. The components for the PCS are quite well rated and understood by the supplier - so failures are rarely from component lot variation. It is clear to me the circuit design is not sufficient.

AC has an additional challenge in that the current flows in both directions. This can cause tremendous stress on components unless the circuit is design to protect against that. Your washer and dyer for example use special AC 'Zero crossing' relays - which only switch when the AC current swings to zero. If you used a normal relay - it would burn out in only a few 100 cycles.

Also the PCS is apparently design to handle both DC and AC high power - which you would normally avoid as they complexity of AC or DC presents their own unique design challenges at PCS power levels.
Thank you for this great detailed explanation. What does this mean in the end for the PCS units in all of the Cybertrucks? Has Tesla solved and fixed the problem with the G variation of the PCS?
 

JackCypher

Well-known member
First Name
Jack
Joined
Jun 13, 2024
Threads
2
Messages
324
Reaction score
425
Location
California
Vehicles
Cybertruck Foundation
Occupation
CEO
Country flag
Thank you for this great detailed explanation. What does this mean in the end for the PCS units in all of the Cybertrucks? Has Tesla solved and fixed the problem with the G variation of the PCS?
I am sure these numerous failures have indicated the failure mode quite well. The solution - as always is a balance of cost vs time to implement. And in reality cars are not intended to work 'forever' so designing for 0 failure is not reality - and I would not expect that.

It could also be the home charger themselves - which may not regulate the AC signal well at 48 amps- causing the PCS to take the brunt of noise/spikes. As these are already in a vast installed base - they may limited in what solution they can take.
 

Bill Carlson

Well-known member
First Name
Bill
Joined
Apr 27, 2025
Threads
2
Messages
48
Reaction score
51
Location
Hopewell Jct, NY
Vehicles
2024 Tesla Cybertruck
Occupation
Engineer
Country flag
Welp, just got my 2nd PCS2 failure. At least this time I still have 24amp AC charging unlike last time where it shut the whole truck down. :/ SC says backlog is still really long.

Edit: 30k miles and almost 2 years of ownership. First failure was on day 3 of ownership at 500 miles.
This is going to sound stupid but what is your normal charging regimen - charge every day? Every other day? Usage of supercharging? Long trips frequently? Anything unusual about your grid/power ?

My example:
- I have 48A 240V at home which I avoid using unless necessary. Once or twice a week to 50% only unless zapping up for a trip.
- I use 30A 240V at work for 2-4 hours daily which covers commuter distance.
- I rarely supercharge unless on longer trip.
- not had a power blip or outage at home in the last 16 months.
- I usually run at 50% or below unless long trip needed which is <twice a year.
 

JCERRN

Well-known member
First Name
J
Joined
May 3, 2021
Threads
33
Messages
1,242
Reaction score
1,419
Location
Around
Vehicles
Yeah
Country flag
I am sure these numerous failures have indicated the failure mode quite well. The solution - as always is a balance of cost vs time to implement. And in reality cars are not intended to work 'forever' so designing for 0 failure is not reality - and I would not expect that.

It could also be the home charger themselves - which may not regulate the AC signal well at 48 amps- causing the PCS to take the brunt of noise/spikes. As these are already in a vast installed base - they may limited in what solution they can take.
If it was the case that the wall chargers were the source, then different models would experience similar stress and therefore would be more prone to fail.
Sponsored

 
 








Top