Well my friend, thatās a nice long argument but the proof is in the pudding. The RWS broke in the field. And the truck is unaffordable to most.
Like I said, affordability, agility, durability. You probably canāt get all three.
I hate to break it to you but he rear end needs to be way beefier than the front due to payload. Thatās part of the design conundrum.
I am really just making the point that while nice, it adds a good amount of cost and complexity. And if you tend to drive trucks well over 100k miles, with some...
Yikes, how much do you think a monster truck costs? And how often do you think (extremely monster trucks get major service done on their steering/suspension? I would just guess itās quite a bit more than most people would want, or be able to afford to deal with in their personal truck.
Iām...
āThe best part is no partā. While four wheel steering makes it easier to park at the strip mall, this is the chance you take in making the rear end unnecessarily complex.
I call %100 BS. The OP has been on the forum for a month. And if you notice, thereās been quite a few brand new members that are trying to pee in everyoneās Cheerios.
I think weāve been invaded by the FUD BOTS.
Is my math right? If the average is .75kw/mile, and you are using the 20-80% range of the battery (as you might on a supercharger road trip), that gives you about 100 miles useable.
This is basically in line with the other tow test I believe.
So in practice terms you can indeed tow long...
I agree. I am disappointed with the range, but a hard no on the supercharging time. That ultimately is what kills it as a road trip capable vehicle, at least to me.
I can only hope that charging times improve eventually.
I think a few of us posted this around the same time lol. I really like the concept! Iām not sure if it is a complete roof top tent or mounts to a roof top tent. It looks like different widths through the video.