This would be true *once* production is ramped up. Until then, the more profitable tri-motor would generate both more revenue and profit for Tesla. This assumes of course batteries are not a constraint. I tend to wonder how many 4680's have been stockpiled. Realistically every single one...
At the base of the rack mount, I would like to see some integrated tie downs as well if I am making a wish list. Even, better integrate the tie down strap somehow into the rack so its all cohesive.
I believe it would still provide some rather large benefits as most EV's have far more torque than the tire traction can handle and are constantly under traction control to prevent the tires from breaking loose. Keep in mind that the traction control software has to have parameters and data to...
Of course but then you would need some tide downs or some other mount inside the bed to keep them from rolling and tumbling around in the bed when not in use. The frunk being more confined would secure them a bit better without additional hardware.
I personally would prefer a much better fitment of the rack bars without the adjustable crossbars just for aesthetics and strength. I am not sure what the heck this would fit at minimal adjustment unless the telescopic minimum is just for smaller storage size, perhaps would fit into the frunk...
I have mentioned this before but I wish they would allow a 30-90day after CT purchase to exercise the reserve locked FSD price. This could allow a sub $80k truck but with the availability of FSD without a penalty. Now this does present one small problem though of not being able to roll the FSD...
I do wonder if regular sheet metal welded/bonded/glued front and rear clip actually have replacement "chunks" that can be ordered for a repairs? If not, the whole conversation really is moot, ie fix at your own risk regardless if stamped or casted.
Due to the value of an EV battery pack and motors on a totaled EV (assuming the battery is intact), I could see insurance companies totaling out an EV then parting it out for $. Technically I would think an EV would have more working drivetrain parts in this scenario than an ICE vehicle would...
I don't recall indicating that the crash absorption rails were part of the castings. In most vehicle collisions regardless of ICE or EV where the damage goes beyond the absorption rails the vehicle will be totaled out by insurance.
Watching some of the more recent build videos of Tesla's, the...
From 3 years ago and not including additional improvements. As I understand it the design of the castings now allow this in additional sections as well. I recall something about there are specific markings or templates to be used to guide where to cut when doing casting repairs. Because of...
I know I am guilty of composing work emails a day or two prior where I though I clicked the send button but had so many windows open that it went for awhile but this looks like it went farther that that.
https://news.yahoo.com/tesla-breakthrough-may-totally-reinvent-220000358.html
My view is no, CT will not impact Rivian sales directly in the short term. Reasoning is that initially slow CT volumes and an enormous backlog will prevent a new decider to choose between the two mentioned options. If you decided in one month from now to buy a new EV truck regardless of your...
Exactly why I could see why Tesla has potentially abandoned the idea of a solar vault cover as an option. Now If it was a standard item (due to high profit margins) it could be doable as a standard option and nobody would be talking about payback time and we would all be rejoicing about it.