You don't even know how to spell the deserve, it is simple that you dont get it, the truck has been delivered to him, and they delivered him bad product, so worst delivery. I do not see any problem, saying worst delivery.
Really 60 mph , you really driven 60 mph on a highway ?
how many cars or slower ugly cars passed you ?
And it is very dangerous driving to show the better range on a truck, if you do not drive , the range will be infinite
Long term investment will depreciate for sure , after 4 years will be like 45k , it is not investment but depreciating asset
mostly people buying CT own model 3 or model y, means they plan to use CT as an SUV but they paying for truck features also
Why do you assume all 2 million reservation would buy the truck , conversion will be 20% at best
Tesla knows about it , that is why on reveal they provided 2024 and 2025 timelines
Turo is not for 1 year or 6 months, time frame, The Turo model is meant for short term rentals, so comparison with Turo does not make sense.
You may find someone with stupid frame of mind going to spend, 100K for yearly lease.
Tesla engineers , oh shoot we forgot about the head lights where to put , the design look work around or after thought , and there is possibility of snow accumulation in front of lights due to narrow opening
there are no issues, with EV and especially Tesla all these things are normal, 340 Miles EPA range for this size of truck is reasonable range. Do not expect a major range increase, Range extender is good option for future if released.
Yes I agree, Tesla has been developing FSD for years, the owners who paid for FSD, their cars have been depreciated already.
when Tesla changed to vision removed Sensors , those customers are still waiting for advance Summon more than a year.
Tesla already changed Hardware more than 3 times...