Search results

$10K more

I find evolution of the tech as interesting as the next guy. That is why I am still here checking out Tesla innovations that deserve the credit but when it comes down to it, none of it is revolutionary, even the powertrain. You still sit in a metal cage with four wheels rotating under you to...

No he means the one that you can get a color included with the price and don’t have to pay extra $6,500 for. The one that comes with a spare you don’t have to pay extra $1,250 for. The one that it’s bed is still usable when carrying a spare. The one you can actually use it’s Frunk space...

The only issue with that plan is ignoring the lesson you just Learned. You can not trust neither the timing nor the price Tesla give you. IF single motor is available in future, it may be in a more distant future, at a higher cost than you think with different specs than you think. Just...

I have no doubt you will enjoy it. If financially it makes sense for you, go for it and don’t let the price take away from the joy. For me, the opportunity cost would be too high.

Not totally surprised but $30K increase for dual motor? I am out.

I was hoping for some explanation on why the first windshield is really perfect and it just looks like there is a flaw in production. You are telling me all of them are bad?

This is not an assault on your cheerios, just trying to help waiting a little easier; Is CT1 windshield really more wavy than CT2? or there is another explanation for how that reflection looks?

My assumption is that is true but don’t know for sure. I don’t own a Tesla but I was under impression other models have enough cameras for 360 view but Tesla has refused to enable that feature. And this guy is driving like he does not have it. May be they are thinking having more processing...

Are you messing with me again? That was 0.46 not 0.39 https://www.cybertruckownersclub.com/forum/threads/gm-vs-cybertruck-battery-size.9343/post-180895

I agree with your general point of view which I assume is until battery density improves significantly, efficiency is all we have to work with. I think I am just projecting my own issues here a bit. I use truckiness of my truck may be 5% of the time at most and 95% of the time, I am dragging...

Not sure if this is posted anywhere else on the forum but I just saw it:

If you are worried about drag and efficiency get a model 3 or Aptera. If you are getting a truck, drive fast and supercharge more often or slow and save a few bucks. A truck with a Cd of 3.0 doing 80 mph consume the same energy as a truck with Cd of 3.9 doing 70 mph. p.s. Rivian is claiming...

Is CT getting fixed?

Is the front wheel of quad actually larger? Or it is camera magic?

Tested by hammer of Franz!

can’t tell if it is photoshopped but the size difference between CT and the tow truck is interesting. How can anyone possibly lift the BAW to put a ticket under it?

I wouldn’t say zero. Larger pack means ; less acceleration for the same power train less payload for the same suspension/tires/…. More cells means greater chance of pack failure. greater cost for Tesla to do warranty replacement and greater cost for owner/insurance company to pay for out...

‘Just horsing around. Didn’t mean to compromise the priceless coveted “metaphorical trophy”.

Does this mean a truck this size does not have 360 view?