Search results

If one cybertruck has it, all will. Elon prefers to keep things simple. Now they may have it, and be disabled, but generally they will let you pay to have it enable.

Seems like it would add a lot of complexity and cost with an increase chance of water leakage, and in the end You would probably find that having two hands free using the auto open function would be more convenient.

Is it official that they will be making 250,000/year ?

Having 400,000 reservations ahead of me, I'm guessing 3 years after the first person gets to configure theirs... sigh.

I love competition, and that Ford added vehicle to house (grid). I hope tesla takes notice, seems like it could easily be integrated with a power wall.

It would be interesting if the 500mi range is based on the CT not having side mirrors? Perhaps that's where the 500+ comes in.

I'm around 400,000 in line, I want a year of reviews before I put my money down. A year of improvements, can make a world of difference in a newly engineered truck.

I going with hell yes, "Yay", but I would probably only go only as high as $5K for this option. They could call it the "Arthritis" option.

I agree with Less, I would prefer the mid gate, up to $5K price. The chevy SSR showes there wasn't much demand for the convertible pickup truck... although I think it looked cool as hell. SSR

I would suspect since I'm a Tesla stock holder, Tesla would have to spin off the so called "Halo" brand, and so I would automatically have stock. Do you think companies can create a product using their funds, and then create a totally new brand to sell it under, and create new stock for nothing?

No, that would be cheating, and the Cybertruck is well worth the asking price already.

I would prefer the mid-gate.

Need to make the Plaid mode more desirable, how else would you get an extra 5 or 10 grand.

At best the 3 motor will be around 2.9 second 0-60, however they may have a Plaid model, that may get you down to the 2.4 or 2.5 second area. Can't imagine what that upgrade would cost.

If it is a true exoskeleton, then a internal panel should not be needed for structural intgrity.

Just out of curiosity, wouldn't the wires to the wireless charger have the 1.5% loss as well?

I agree, every one compares wireless charging to phone charging, there are several magnitudes difference. I can only imagine the power lose, and the increase time to fully charge.

Elon sues due to stupidity (like a law that states that mirror is the only way to see behind you), so yes, he would sue on this too.

1> 500 mile range 2> FSD (most likely company to create it) 3> It's an EV. 4> It hauls like a truck 5> It hauls ass, like a sport car.

No, I think it should be on the outside, and be solar panel.