Well, that's the responsibility of the board and and committee that put together the package.
A couple of people recused themselves due to their close ties with musk. That's the intent of disclosure of close relationships.
You seem to be taking misinformed as an insult. It's not.
The misinformation from the board to the shareholders:
Page 82:
So unless you were on the board/committee and privy to that information, you (in the collective sense) were likely misinformed on the vote.
Musk didn't do his due diligence before signing a deal.
The "receipts" he came up with were... at best laughable.
After that, the courts forced twitter to provide data, "firehose of data" which musk and co later ran and came up with nothing verifiable.
Had the court allowed musk to break the...
Ironically the reasoning that he deserves the pay package some people are positing, is the same reasoning the judge came to the conclusion that the package was unfairly put together.
You do realize Reuters did the investigation. They are the source, from contacting owners.
They are the source.
The other articles you're talking about are sourcing Reuters.
Well that's how anonymous sources work in reporting.
"I'm the lead person in charge of the gigapress my employee id is 3" would probably get them canned.
Investor day was the aspiration.
This article intimates that such a frame has been produced and just specifics need to be sorted out for the low cost model 2
Since electrek is TERRIBLE at sourcing:
Full article:
https://www.reuters.com/technology/gigacasting-20-tesla-reinvents-carmaking-with-quiet-breakthrough-2023-09-14/#:~:text=AUSTIN%2C%20Texas%2C%20Sept%2014%20(,familiar%20with%20the%20move%20said.