Sponsored

2nd PCS2 failure

PungoteagueDave

Well-known member
First Name
David
Joined
Mar 2, 2025
Threads
2
Messages
939
Reaction score
1,020
Location
Boynton Beach
Vehicles
‘25 Tesla Cybertruck, ‘26 Tesla MY Launch, ‘13 Porsche C4S, ‘26 BMW R1300 GSA
Occupation
retired
Country flag
Isn’t this likely due to your first issue being a very early failure before the updated parts or PCS failures even trending (1.5-2 years ago)? So this shouldn’t be interpreted as a continuing risk for those who have replaced their PCS in recent months, which seems to be the majority of cases?
Sponsored

 

gooshjkc

Well-known member
First Name
Jasper
Joined
Mar 21, 2024
Threads
12
Messages
239
Reaction score
339
Location
Atlanta, GA
Vehicles
MB EQS SUV 580
Occupation
Real Estate
Country flag
I just had my replaced. So far so good. However, reading this post is giving anxiety that it might happen again. Ugh!!! Tesla really need to address this and not just put a band-aid on it.
 

Vagis9780

Well-known member
First Name
David
Joined
Jan 25, 2021
Threads
10
Messages
194
Reaction score
202
Location
Louisiana
Vehicles
Cyber Truck
Occupation
Retired
Country flag
Welp, just got my 2nd PCS2 failure. At least this time I still have 24amp AC charging unlike last time where it shut the whole truck down. :/ SC says backlog is still really long.

Edit: 30k miles and almost 2 years of ownership. First failure was on day 3 of ownership at 500 miles.

My guess the PSC is the on board inverter required to take your home 120v AC electric and invert to DC voltage to required to charge battery,(unlike Supercharger which charges DC to DC). I also assume CT PSC is also used to power 48v systems and why we are NOT seeing PSC failures on other Tesla vehicles.
 

SCTesla

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 11, 2024
Threads
6
Messages
2,479
Reaction score
3,689
Location
USA
Vehicles
22 Model S, 24 CT
Country flag
Isn’t this likely due to your first issue being a very early failure before the updated parts or PCS failures even trending (1.5-2 years ago)? So this shouldn’t be interpreted as a continuing risk for those who have replaced their PCS in recent months, which seems to be the majority of cases?
I was told they are working on a new revision and that's what I am waiting for.
 

gooshjkc

Well-known member
First Name
Jasper
Joined
Mar 21, 2024
Threads
12
Messages
239
Reaction score
339
Location
Atlanta, GA
Vehicles
MB EQS SUV 580
Occupation
Real Estate
Country flag
I was told they are working on a new revision and that's what I am waiting for.
That’s all good and dandy. However, are they going to recall every CT and replace them for free or we going to have to cough up the dough to do it. Especially for the ones that the warranty is over.
 


SCTesla

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 11, 2024
Threads
6
Messages
2,479
Reaction score
3,689
Location
USA
Vehicles
22 Model S, 24 CT
Country flag
That’s all good and dandy. However, are they going to recall every CT and replace them for free or we going to have to cough up the dough to do it. Especially for the ones that the warranty is over.
There isn't a recall currently. It's hard to say.

They've automated a lot of the process now as they are so common. It automatically gives you free Supercharging once the self check fails.
 

JackCypher

Well-known member
First Name
Jack
Joined
Jun 13, 2024
Threads
2
Messages
323
Reaction score
418
Location
California
Vehicles
Cybertruck Foundation
Occupation
CEO
Country flag
I have experience in high power / energy systems, electronics. The components for the PCS are quite well rated and understood by the supplier - so failures are rarely from component lot variation. It is clear to me the circuit design is not sufficient.

AC has an additional challenge in that the current flows in both directions. This can cause tremendous stress on components unless the circuit is design to protect against that. Your washer and dyer for example use special AC 'Zero crossing' relays - which only switch when the AC current swings to zero. If you used a normal relay - it would burn out in only a few 100 cycles.

Also the PCS is apparently design to handle both DC and AC high power - which you would normally avoid as they complexity of AC or DC presents their own unique design challenges at PCS power levels.
 

devdrone6

Well-known member
First Name
Dev
Joined
Aug 28, 2024
Threads
27
Messages
1,015
Reaction score
2,135
Location
Nebraska
Vehicles
Cybertruck, 2023 Model Y
Country flag
That’s all good and dandy. However, are they going to recall every CT and replace them for free or we going to have to cough up the dough to do it. Especially for the ones that the warranty is over.
The answer is No and Yes. Several cases here where tesla did compensate out of warranty trucks, not the full amount but a good chunk of it. Not ideal, but better than nothing.

I have the G version so hope that lasts 👍
 

Ranger George

Well-known member
First Name
George
Joined
Apr 26, 2021
Threads
0
Messages
69
Reaction score
108
Location
Hawaii Island
Vehicles
Cybertruck
Occupation
Ranger
Country flag
I have experience in high power / energy systems, electronics. The components for the PCS are quite well rated and understood by the supplier - so failures are rarely from component lot variation. It is clear to me the circuit design is not sufficient.

AC has an additional challenge in that the current flows in both directions. This can cause tremendous stress on components unless the circuit is design to protect against that. Your washer and dyer for example use special AC 'Zero crossing' relays - which only switch when the AC current swings to zero. If you used a normal relay - it would burn out in only a few 100 cycles.

Also the PCS is apparently design to handle both DC and AC high power - which you would normally avoid as they complexity of AC or DC presents their own unique design challenges at PCS power levels.
Thank you for this great detailed explanation. What does this mean in the end for the PCS units in all of the Cybertrucks? Has Tesla solved and fixed the problem with the G variation of the PCS?
Sponsored

 
 








Top