You know what, that could work........If they kept the same beltline as the concept and change the 35s for some 275/55/17s that could work nicely. They can lose 12 inches from the bed, 3 from the front and 3 from the interior.......it works......with higher "ass", the rearseat guys would be fine.
I don't think you can make an "International" version of this truck. 220" is possibly the shortest length you can make it before the rear seats become useless. At 208, they would have to design a new (NON-TRIANGLE) truck or a 3 seat single cab truck. Seeing how massive this thing was at the...
LOL, I had one until I bought a house in the city, I was already thinking about how I can cut into the house for a few more inches before these new specs. I don't think you'll notice the difference with the tailgate. The angle might be a little steeper. I estimate only a few inches shorter.
Okay, last one.
The orange outline is the original size......my photoshop skills are a novice so bear with me.
I must say I love this rendering way more than the original monster.
This is going to be such a game-changer, I can't wait.
I'd switch in a heartbeat. I don't really need a truck, I need an EV. I can do with a Model Y, but having the bed to put my "stuff" in was a game-changer. Maybe 20% of sales of the current CT will be to guys that actually take them to the worksite. I don't think it's even that high for ICE...
This chop wouldn't be bad at all.....the portions are relatively the same and at a glance, you'll hardly notice the change.
same 6.5 bed. I was good with the concept as is.....but making the center line a bit more level will look better from the rearview. I did this chop to keep my sanity...