Search results

Never mind it looks like they sheared off the true rear casting assembly:

This is the Rear Under Body frame rails, are these meant to be breakaway? Maybe its operating as designed for crash worthiness? https://service.tesla.com/docs/Cybertruck/BodyRepair/BodyRepairProcedures/en-us/GUID-0611074E-4F3C-417E-86AB-5BBC588393CC.html

Also if these things really did bust towing 11k lbs on the highway hitting a large pothole... y'all would post it on here :D

Not going to lie I was in the camp of "the concrete broke the hitch, this would never happen in real life". But after watching his followup video and seeing the F150 frame take that abuse... Maybe they should make the CT casting thicker. Easier said than done. Im still getting my CT :D

We got some new info from Munro today (video below)! 192S7P Battery arrangement with 1344 cells. I will be updating the main post with the new information. But back of the napkin math: 124,000Wh / 1344 cells =~92Wh of energy per Gen2 4680 cell.

Well this is the end of this thread, in the end Tesla went with 1366 Cells for a total pack energy of 123,000 Wh. This results in almost exactly 90 Wh per cell. Working backwards w/ the 10% density improvements this put the Gen1 Model Y 4680 cell I would have expected a minimum of 95 Wh per cell...

This settles it ?. Aerodynamics only maybe?

Am I the only one who thinks that space can fit a spare tire? I don't know about a 35" mudder but definitely a street tire. It could also be the sub-vault trunk basin, I think less likely because they said you could access the inverter/motor from the sub-vault trunk and that would position it...

My opinion is that you can hid a full size spare tire under there, that is why there is such a massive plastic cover in the rear.

The nozzles would be in the wiper itself, like @SlightlySinged said. That is the way windshield wiper fluid gets distributed on all Tesla's today!

I'm not looking for confirmation bias at all, it is not an exoskeleton. During the 2019 reveal event they said it would be an exoskeleton where the stainless steel body would actually be structural. I do not believe the stainless steel panels on the current unibody implementation are structural...

Is it a typo... or on purpose? Because we all know they scrapped the strict "Exoskeleton" route, we all know it is stainless steel panels on uni body frame.

1. The emergency frunk opener 2. Windshield wiper fluid? 3. ??? Can someone help identify

The tiny details might matter here. Displayed SOC on the screen for 71% on the BMS could be anywhere from 70.5%-71.4% a 0.9% margin of error. That also means that arrival SOC has same margin of 64.5%-65.4%. If you take the absolute worst case scenario that is leaving at 71.4% and arriving at...

What do you guys think of this video?

Am I blind?? Where is the label

You're right sorry I was thinking of the grassy venue where they brought out the original prototype from the peterson, I just looked up the electrified cars + coffee.

this is an RC unit not the original prototype that franz took to the cars and coffee. But I was just saying this is the latest version of the RC units

no prob! I think it was from this walk around: