For anyone reading this,
Just keep in mind his original claim of payload increase. Now note how this is not addressed at all and his argument changes.
š
None of this increases payload as you claimed. Nothing he discusses addresses your claim. Youāre really grasping here. Pretty telling how...
lol that video provides no context.
Thatās not a source for any information.
You cry about facts and sources but never provide any. The patent took 10 seconds to findā¦
Wes does not discuss payload in relation to the exoskeleton in that video, just briefly alludes to crash loads and durability...
Citrisurf isn't nasty stuff, it's citric acid.
77 is designed to remove surface contamination
77 Plus is designed to remove rust, not just contamination.
The manual explains how to calculate the weight pretty well with three examples including a four bike hitch rack at 220lbs total.
https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/cybertruck/en_us/GUID-EBDD7BD9-8942-45CA-8E0D-26B48185DEB9.html
Highlighting sentences that do not alter nor expand upon what previous sentences stated is what you did. Thatās all you did. That would be considered what is known as a strawman fallacy, something you called out another user for previously. Still donāt understand what that is? maybe donāt call...
Point out my lie.
Do it?
You won't because you can't, as seen in this entire thread. lol
You can't even argue in good faith, you redirect, attack, blame, and lie all while accusing others of doing those same things.
Instead of highlighting quotes backing up my assertions, form your own...
Did I claim it did? Did I use this as a reference?
No.
I didn't claim it did.
I simply provided the link for you because you clearly cannot figure anything out. lol
You might need to chill out a bit, getting a little emotional ;)
You didn't address anything again.
He doesn't even know where it went, how much it was, and why it went. He is acknowledging that in the quotes you highlighted.
You couldn't provide one source of your own or figure out where one statement ends and another begins.
lol you are soft.
Where's your receipts?
Still waiting?
No generic link to a page that links Fox News article.
USAID spending is all public and detailed. Link it. C'mon.
Here, I did the work for you because you clearly cannot.
Here's Trump stating it...
You haven't corrected anything, you aren't even capable of representing those quotes correctly in your own head. Again, that maybe refers to the robotaxi claim.
This is exactly what you asked for and you ignored it. No maybe, no perhaps. A definitive claim. Same as the first quote that you...
You are claiming he is wrong. Prove it, it shouldn't be hard.
Where does it provide sources for what was in question? It doesn't. It's not on that page. No mention of that spending approval or the condoms.
Again, provide a source for the specific claim we are discussing. Stop avoiding...
Instead of strawmanning, address his claim.
You ask for a lot of evidence because you do not believe the claims but provide none yourself to back up your counterclaim/stance/disagreement/whatever you want to call it.
Please provide evidence to back up this claim that you are defending:
This has some claims about both HW3 supporting FSD Feature Complete as well as a Robotaxi network by "next year", This is from April 19th, 2022:
(Timestamped) Feature complete (HW3):
(Timestamped) FSD Feature complete means Level 5, no geofence confirmation:
(Timestamped) Here it is again...
Chuck Cook did it for 13.2.4, he may have done one more recently. He also tested park assist with it covered and uncovered with no difference in performance.
DirtyTesla covered their front bumper camera two days ago with no issues.