Search results

they are among us

Not everyone is guessing 🤷🏻‍♂️

Love when I guy throwing sucker punches misses, then acts like it’s cause he takes the high road

it’s an increasingly bold assumption that Tesla is above changing the non-FS pricing once that occurs I’m not sayin’, I’m just sayin’

unwittingly telling the everyone here that knows that you don’t know much and throwing strays, without bothering looking up the posts to have any basis for it hat you’re saying - lazy those posts were saying, in short, “if you want to stop legit flippers, this won’t do it - it’ll do as much...

:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: Now this was Tesla’s mastermind plan?

As has been clarified but worth repeating: that is not how the provision works and to further clarify how the provision works: (1) Tesla has zero obligation to repurchase any truck, no matter the reason put forward by a buyer (and anyone expecting Tesla to be detail-oriented and emotionally...

The ride height cD changes aren’t really that relative, in that: (1) in street mode, the CT doesn’t stick in those h nights and defaults back to low at speed (2) in offroad the height sticks to a point, but who’s fretting about eg high speed long distance efficiency in offroad mode the...

The roof? Were they breaking in or just plain vandalizing

Not sure I follow the exact question you’re asking could you re-phrase?

Yes, if by VIN, that number would include 130 ‘rest’ vehicles (110MCs and 20 showroom units), but would not include the VIN gaps remaining for Cyberbeasts (conceivably 300 or more). Folks need to remember that, where it comes to VIN numbers, there are essentially two different vehicle streams...

oh hey, I get it! with my business executive hat on, I slow clap for Tesla corporate. but with my consumer hat on, I’m left marveling at how many other consumers don’t seem to mind the hypocrisy! but separately, lower than marveling, who I *really* don’t get are the consumers who are out...

/təˈmeɪtəʊ/ - /təˈmɑːtəʊ/ /pəˈteɪtəʊ/ - /pəˈtɑːtəʊ/

which to me goes to show the intent of this program Tesla knows there will be some blow-back to this program from existing orders and people with lower arms who still haven’t been invited to even config so what does Tesla view as the upside that outweighs this blowback? Seems to me it’s...

oh they definitely are They’ve built very few beasts to date, and there are many people with beast configs before yesterday - who were getting EDDs of ‘mid to late 2024’ someone who configured a Beast tomorrow with an EDD OF 45 days is getting it sooner 🤣

wouldn’t be so jarring if everyone wasn’t always going on about how they love Tesla’s sales tactics compared to traditional dealerships…

yeah, clearly a sprayer is better than no sprayer! And many backup cameras on many models have the issue of clarity in the rain, unless they are sufficiently tucked under some sort of awning feature in the rear. And worth mentioning that the CT is not the only Tesla with this rear camera rain...

it’s not only a washer a washer alone doesn’t solve for how this camera is occluded when water itself is the problem (ie rain/snow). it needs a solution for not only dirt/mud, but also weather conditions which weather conditions, arguably, are when it’s most important to have sufficient...

so? because the obvious sub-point to this discussion is that the camera solution provided by Tesla isn’t up to snuff in some’s view Just asserting that cameras/displays can sufficiently replace a mirror** isn’t really relevant to whether the CT’s camera/displays do so **meanwhile, not to...

What @SolarWizard said, but also I like gladiator nets - and the cargo divider offered by Tesla and others a related solution type