We know they were producing in December. They started some time between June of last year and December.Texas has only been producing cells for ~6 months.
60% of the time, it works every time.Very true, but it's progress. It took Austin a year to do 10x what Fremont did in twice the time. Things are moving forward, speeding up.
-Crissa
that post was total — inclauding Fremont which started first and had a huge head start.Based on this timeline, the pace hasnt changed much since this post.
based on napkin math thats in the neighborhood of 6-700 cybertrucks worth of batteries per week lets just say that by now theyve added a little more capacity and its 800 CTs. Thats 50k trucks per year. Are they actually gonna 8x that figure to produce 375k CTs ?
if anything, the CT will require more than double the amount of batteries vs SR MY right?
![]()
Thats incorrect.Well, they're currently making 0 Cybertrucks per week, so...
-Crissa
If you have some stats showing a weekly output of trucks when I posted that of 1 or more, go ahead.Thats incorrect.
And no mention of Panasonic 4680 battery production in Giga Nevada?If they are building another 4680 facility near Freemont, to me it indicates they have settled on one of the two options they were testing.
Could also mean they are satisfied with the current capacity to scale it out.
I don't think they would move on out of desperation.
We don't know who will run the 4680 line in Nevada, if it'll be under contract or direct.And no mention of Panasonic 4680 battery production in Giga Nevada?
I don't know if it already changed, but I understand Giga NV is all Panasonic. I am not sure too on whose technology it is on 4680.We don't know who will run the 4680 line in Nevada, if it'll be under contract or direct.
-Crissa