You're conflating ridicule with hate.
I agree that the source of hate is fear, but again not in how you're presenting it. The fear some people have is rooted in the fact there is an individual who promotes alternative views and who also happens to have a massive amount of power seemingly not subject to any oversight.
There was some genuine Cybertruck ridicule too. But most of the ridicule was driven by the kind of fear I mentioned above. Existing money and power will always struggle to maintain the source of that money and power. Thankfully, in a democracy, they will not always be effective. Democracy provides for a changing of the guard.
Elon is influential because he is highly respected. Otherwise, no one would give him the time of day.
Not everyone has the capacity to be self-critical and the ability to overcome bias. Have a nice day.
The Cybertruck symbolises change. The "next generation" of change...
Respectfully, let me TL/DR this for you.The Cybertruck symbolises change. The "next generation" of change...
There is a lot of change going on in the world, hopefully the learnings of the iterations of change will create a better world, by narrowing down the truth and establishing these new insights based on science fact, not fiction.
I've said this many times before, people can either be the victims of change or the architects of it, personally I prefer to be an architect, and promote sustainable change that intentionally makes lives better.
So even though some people can be resistant to change, or in fact fear change, that doesn't in of itself make change good or bad. This can only be determined AFTER it has been thoroughly tested, in operation in it's working environment, to see if it meets it's objectives, and if not adjusted to suit.
The lack of knowledge is fear. That is why you need courage to overcome the unknown.
What should be clear is that there are different methodologies to creating change, some can be seen as organic or haphazard, as changes by "chance". Other's can be identified as intentional or "engineered" changes, where one pragmatically filters out the things that don't work to expose what does. This could be considered similar to the difference between "creative design" or "natural evolution", the difference being that an engineered design can often leapfrog iterations of change without physical models, whilst the evolutionary change must labour through each by way of extinction, with only the surviving traits making another step forwards.
Fundamentally, it's highly possible that from the depths of the "information age" and through the development of our combined webbed "artificial intelligence" as a species and amalgamation of knowledge, along with our leveraging of technology inside such a systemic revolution, we can better know and understand the depths of natural world, and by doing so no longer fear it, but push ahead to new frontiers, where change is not feared or avoided, but welcomed and expected.
It's time to not let the lesser emotions control our destiny in the stars.
I don't think the target audience, aka, e.g. the haters, is going to understand any of this...The Cybertruck symbolises change. The "next generation" of change...
There is a lot of change going on in the world, hopefully the learnings of the iterations of change will create a better world, by narrowing down the truth and establishing these new insights based on science fact, not fiction.
I've said this many times before, people can either be the victims of change or the architects of it, personally I prefer to be an architect, and promote sustainable change that intentionally makes lives better.
So even though some people can be resistant to change, or in fact fear change, that doesn't in of itself make change good or bad. This can only be determined AFTER it has been thoroughly tested, in operation in it's working environment, to see if it meets it's objectives, and if not adjusted to suit.
The lack of knowledge is fear. That is why you need courage to overcome the unknown.
What should be clear is that there are different methodologies to creating change, some can be seen as organic or haphazard, as changes by "chance". Other's can be identified as intentional or "engineered" changes, where one pragmatically filters out the things that don't work to expose what does. This could be considered similar to the difference between "creative design" or "natural evolution", the difference being that an engineered design can often leapfrog iterations of change without physical models, whilst the evolutionary change must labour through each by way of extinction, with only the surviving traits making another step forwards.
Fundamentally, it's highly possible that from the depths of the "information age" and through the development of our combined webbed "artificial intelligence" as a species and amalgamation of knowledge, along with our leveraging of technology inside such a systemic revolution, we can better know and understand the depths of natural world, and by doing so no longer fear it, but push ahead to new frontiers, where change is not feared or avoided, but welcomed and expected.
It's time to not let the lesser emotions control our destiny in the stars.
