Sponsored

HaulingAss

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 3, 2020
Threads
28
Messages
10,298
Reaction score
20,703
Location
Western Washington, USA
Vehicles
Cybertruck DM, 2010 F-150, 2018 Performance Model 3, 2024 Performance Model 3
Country flag
Again, the nag isn't forced or necessitated by regulators. It's due to the software only being level 2. Once FSD is good enough, Tesla can remove monitoring and not need approval in many jurisdictions.

Tesla has already reduced the nag and will further reduce it with 14.3, potentially even eliminate it, according to Elon
The "level" of autonomy is artificial and inconsequential. The only thing that matters is that regulators require all supervised self-driving to have effective driver monitoring. They have investigated Tesla over this before.

Don't worry, they are from the government and they are here to help you! LOL!
Sponsored

 

SCTesla

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 11, 2024
Threads
6
Messages
2,463
Reaction score
3,679
Location
USA
Vehicles
22 Model S, 24 CT
Country flag
The "level" of autonomy is artificial and inconsequential. The only thing that matters is that regulators require all supervised self-driving to have effective driver monitoring. They have investigated Tesla over this before.

Don't worry, they are from the government and they are here to help you! LOL!
The levels do mean something in a sense. That's why Tesla, Elon, government agencies refer to them, but ADAS does not require monitoring. The regulators push back on Supervised monitoring because they question how the manufacturer enforces supervision. Tesla could ignore this (as they did in the beginning), but then when issues occur, they are liable. Most of the safeguards like driver monitoring are to ensure that you (the driver) does their part in Supervising, but once the system is good enough, the supervision can be relaxed as we've already seen with FSD 13 and we will further see with FSD 14.

Tesla can absolutely allow 10 (or more) seconds of freedom once they have confidence in the system if they wanted while still being "Supervised". That's what Tesla's plans are currently before FSDU, to relax monitoring to allow things like "texting", even though texting itself is legal, but activities like that.

The only NHTSA investigation over Tesla actions with FSD have been rolling stops. The investigation that create wheel nag, which later changed to vision monitoring started with Accidents and breaking laws. The NHTSA isn't going to investigate FSD for simply removing or not having monitoring, but if cars start getting into accidents and Tesla's response is "The drivers are responsible", then the NHTSA will look into how Tesla is enforcing this responsibility.

It may seem like semantics, but FSD can easily reduce monitoring without any permissions from anyone. For full unsupervised driving, there are many states where they do not need permission, but some that they do.

TLDR: The nag and how strict it is isn't dictated by government or regulators.
 

HaulingAss

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 3, 2020
Threads
28
Messages
10,298
Reaction score
20,703
Location
Western Washington, USA
Vehicles
Cybertruck DM, 2010 F-150, 2018 Performance Model 3, 2024 Performance Model 3
Country flag
It may seem like semantics, but FSD can easily reduce monitoring without any permissions from anyone. For full unsupervised driving, there are many states where they do not need permission, but some that they do.
Sure, Tesla might not need permission to completely remove driver monitoring, but if they are found not to have effective enough monitoring they can certainly crack down on them. Tesla errs on the side of safety.

TLDR: The nag and how strict it is isn't dictated by government or regulators.
The government regulators are largely reactive, not proactive. Tesla doesn't know what they will do in terms of enforcement until they actually do it. For example, the rolling stop.

My point was, that Tesla is safety focused, as they should be, and if they start kowtowing to a few owners who find driver monitoring overly burdensome, Tesla will likely land themselves in hotter water. The regulators absolutely take an active interest in whether the driver monitoring of any supervised self-driving is adequate and has the desired effect. Also, how easy it is for a driver to fool the driver monitoring system.
 


rovert43

Well-known member
First Name
Trevor
Joined
Sep 17, 2024
Threads
9
Messages
160
Reaction score
186
Location
Covina, CA
Vehicles
2024 Cybertruck Foundation AWD
Occupation
IT Mamager
Country flag
So I took my son to School this morning, unprotected turns not an issue, even when a car is trying to turn unprotected in the adjacent lane it seems to know. Scrolling between driving modes is great, sensed the school zones and slowed only when children were present.

Noticed it stuttered a few times from stop, only if it thought a vehicle was approaching too quickly or sensed a pedestrian too close to the curb. Needs some work there, otherwise very minor and brief lane hugging.

Overall great improvement, and very satisfied with the upgrade.
 

Professor

Well-known member
First Name
Robert
Joined
May 23, 2025
Threads
11
Messages
252
Reaction score
390
Location
NorCal
Website
www.roberthawthorne.net
Vehicles
Cybertruck Foundation Series AWD, Ducati ST2
Occupation
Theatre Technician
Country flag
Sure, Tesla might not need permission to completely remove driver monitoring, but if they are found not to have effective enough monitoring they can certainly crack down on them. Tesla errs on the side of safety.



The government regulators are largely reactive, not proactive. Tesla doesn't know what they will do in terms of enforcement until they actually do it. For example, the rolling stop.

My point was, that Tesla is safety focused, as they should be, and if they start kowtowing to a few owners who find driver monitoring overly burdensome, Tesla will likely land themselves in hotter water. The regulators absolutely take an active interest in whether the driver monitoring of any supervised self-driving is adequate and has the desired effect. Also, how easy it is for a driver to fool the driver monitoring system.
Is that why we have a 2 second pause at stop-signs? I have always found that annoying. Because they got snagged for rolling stops? I've even been honked at.
 

Pulaski

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 17, 2023
Threads
4
Messages
310
Reaction score
530
Location
Minnesota
Vehicles
Ram 5500(2021), F-450(2014), Chevy Colorado(2022), FS CB
Country flag
Damn, just got it parked in MN. Didn't expect that roll out this quick
 


SCTesla

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 11, 2024
Threads
6
Messages
2,463
Reaction score
3,679
Location
USA
Vehicles
22 Model S, 24 CT
Country flag
Sure, Tesla might not need permission to completely remove driver monitoring, but if they are found not to have effective enough monitoring they can certainly crack down on them. Tesla errs on the side of safety.



The government regulators are largely reactive, not proactive. Tesla doesn't know what they will do in terms of enforcement until they actually do it. For example, the rolling stop.

My point was, that Tesla is safety focused, as they should be, and if they start kowtowing to a few owners who find driver monitoring overly burdensome, Tesla will likely land themselves in hotter water. The regulators absolutely take an active interest in whether the driver monitoring of any supervised self-driving is adequate and has the desired effect. Also, how easy it is for a driver to fool the driver monitoring system.
Ok. We agree, then.

But...Elon and Ashok have said that soon we will see less monitoring...that doesn't mean it will be gone.
 

Macgyverfever

Well-known member
First Name
Regular Don-Won
Joined
Oct 21, 2021
Threads
15
Messages
443
Reaction score
888
Location
Tn
Vehicles
MYP BLUE/WHITE, M3RWD GRAY/BLACK
Occupation
Multifaceted IT Professional
Country flag
Boom - parked me in taco bell parking lot - stayed centered in highway lane!!!

Tesla Cybertruck FSD v14.1.7 rolling out to all Cybertruck owners! Update yours yet?? Screenshot_20251113_123447_Gallery
 

AverageJoe

Well-known member
First Name
John
Joined
Jun 15, 2025
Threads
14
Messages
282
Reaction score
315
Location
Olive Hill, KY
Vehicles
2024 CT AWD, 2022 MYP, 2016 MX 90D
Occupation
Retired Military, House Husband
Country flag
Went through the car wash this morning no issues at all definitely like enabling Free role works really well in Carwash mode pretty happy overall with FSD 14.1.7 on my 3 mile commute to work this morning. I did notice the truck avoided the 2 pot holes coming into my complex, which I thought was amazing, now i am looking forward to the storm drains that dip on the passenger side, also want to see if it will avoid manhole covers that are higher or lower than usual. so far pretty happy
Went through the car wash? In FSD?
 

Tallgeese179

Well-known member
First Name
Nikola
Joined
Sep 11, 2025
Threads
4
Messages
162
Reaction score
333
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
Vehicles
2025 CT AWD, 21 BMW X7, 15 370Z Nismo
Country flag
Boom - parked me in taco bell parking lot - stayed centered in highway lane!!!

Screenshot_20251113_123447_Gallery.webp
Love the song choice, used it for testing the speakers when I first took test drives in the Y/3/CT.

Unrelated, is this what light mode looks like?? I always have dark mode so this looks alien to me. Looks airy and nice 🙂
 

HaulingAss

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 3, 2020
Threads
28
Messages
10,298
Reaction score
20,703
Location
Western Washington, USA
Vehicles
Cybertruck DM, 2010 F-150, 2018 Performance Model 3, 2024 Performance Model 3
Country flag
Is that why we have a 2 second pause at stop-signs? I have always found that annoying. Because they got snagged for rolling stops? I've even been honked at.
Absolutely! It used to just roll right through when it could see there was no cross traffic. NHTSA threatened them, that's why Chuck Cook is always saying "There's the "Nitsa" stop".
Sponsored

 
 








Top