Search results

This is a duplicate thread - discussed here: https://www.cybertruckownersclub.com/forum/threads/cybertruck-can’t-tug-of-war-software-limited.12521/ To be clear, the Cybertruck didn’t “lose,” it couldn’t pull at all if the hitched to something with opposing direction - it appears somehow...

what’s strange is to think it’s strange after your OP ??‍♂️

first (congrats!)

That beasts are going out is no big surprise at this stage (perhaps especially with the 30k referral flourish). The better question is how/when are beasts going out that aren’t allocated to Tesla Friends & Family. Regardless, that ‘line’ for Beasts should move at a slower pace, about 1/9th...

gregger might still be getting some lift from xwitter cyber-influenza he afterall has a 1130 RN and already has a config, VIN, and delivery date - not sure his other data can be viewed reliably as any less unique

What are y’all’s relative VINs? if it’s a batch related containment hold, I’d assume some distance between your VINs

exactly and it doesn’t mean that either are moving at full capacity once the 2nd is built they can both be completed for 125k installed capacity, but each moving at ~1/2 capacity in any event, the 125k current installed, and the variously suggested 250k installed, *are* the 1st/2nd “lines”...

4-door, 6-foot bed Tacomas for that matter which are spitting distance from both the interior volumes of a Cat, and nearly identical in bed cargo volumes of a CT

I think it’s all a matter of what someone imagines in their mind when they think “second line” What cuts through that confusion is speaking instead of total installed capacity at a given manufacturing plant. (Which clarity is why public disclosures speak in these terms.) it’s no accident that...

infra itself together with miss-perceptions around it’s importance I mean, just look at this forum - which skews informed and still swaths of people say things like “I need a truck that can go 350 miles without having to stop, and can’t imagine doing less than 85mph on any highway - it’s...

see, great example of several nuances that might better explain Rivian and Lightning than; “CT barely delivered, and foreseeable future only to people with year’s-long reservations”

doesn’t this framing miss/ignore the broader context of all EV sales cooling/retracting, but especially expensive ones? May as well suggest Cybertruck responsible for the price whole market dynamic

that game of telephone may miss the nuance between eg some steady 80/day rate vs had a recent single day where they hit 80 in a day doesn’t really change the substance of the point, but may change the valence of the interpretation by others True that this week they had an 80+ day

depends on the temp of the battery

it’s exactly real world which is why the EPA uses it that didn’t take long …

" The consumption data is even more interesting. While testing the Rivian, the R1T used 42.3 kWh of energy to travel 100 miles, and the Lightning used 43.7 kWh per 100 miles. Despite being shaped like a giant brutalist triangle, the Cybertruck used 45.1 kWh of energy, making it slightly less...

if your daily production exceeds your daily transports then ...

which comment is encouraging only if in another vehicle you wouldn't have hit the tree in the first place?

you're missing the point being made here - there are different ranges on the two different tires the AWD/340 and Beast/320 numbers are on the all season tires, which this test unit was not on This test unit was on the all terrain tires, which have Tesla-purported ranges of AWD/320 and Beast/300