Sponsored

Search results

  1. scottf200

    Breaking: 2025 AWD Cybertruck now officially qualifies for $7500 federal tax credit

    I already paid extra in IL for an electric vehicle on this road tax as well as in NC now.
  2. scottf200

    New Discounts on 2024 Cybertrucks

    Looks like it based on inventory: https://www.tesla.com/inventory/new/ct?TRIM=CTAWD&arrangeby=plh&zip=28202&range=0
  3. scottf200

    Tesla Model "Q" teased?

    Thanks. Good summary video (6:50 that I watched at 2x speed.
  4. scottf200

    New Discounts on 2024 Cybertrucks

    I hear you. This is the youtube channel I think I saw it on:
  5. scottf200

    New Discounts on 2024 Cybertrucks

    Wow. 3 rows of them as they went down and up the next lane over.
  6. scottf200

    New Discounts on 2024 Cybertrucks

    That is a very small percentage. I've seen youtube vids and articles on exports and additional cost to make it compatible with local laws. With no Tesla Service Center support and a new vehicle with a lot of bugs still that is a nightmare. See service bulletins and problems on this site.
  7. scottf200

    Breaking: 2025 AWD Cybertruck now officially qualifies for $7500 federal tax credit

    Yet another option for those that didn't jump: Thread: https://www.cybertruckownersclub.com/forum/threads/new-discounts-on-2024-cybertrucks.36231/
  8. scottf200

    New Discounts on 2024 Cybertrucks

    I would have guessed those that were waiting for the $7500 tax credit jumped already. Wonder what type of buyer is now left. thread: https://www.cybertruckownersclub.com/forum/threads/breaking-2025-awd-cybertruck-now-officially-qualifies-for-7500-federal-tax-credit.35666/
  9. scottf200

    Neighbors Called Police on Cybertruck

    When I quickly read that I saw the word cosplay jump out at me. :ROFLMAO:
  10. scottf200

    Poor Level 1 charging efficiency

    True. In my past 2 of the 3 EVs were charing on 12a overnight as their commute was relatively short. Of course. Only 5.6% less. I wasn't being critical just pointing out she was getting less than optimal based on data she provided.
  11. scottf200

    Poor Level 1 charging efficiency

    Her pictures show 118V and 12A so she was getting 1416W
  12. scottf200

    Poor Level 1 charging efficiency

    The DPDT (Double-Pole Double-Throw) was in "Series" in her picture ... so 800V. 400V is for Supercharging on V1-V3.5; 800V on V4 800V on some non-Tesla DCFC chargers already NxuOne™
  13. scottf200

    -417 Wh/mi, I guess it's true!

    I don't think it was missed as case-in-point below since you use the ABS(417)*120% on the way up. As well any of us driving EVs for a while have seen that negative kW for regen in many discussions. Some were focusing on your average driving Wh/mi which actually was really low for a CT in...
  14. scottf200

    -417 Wh/mi, I guess it's true!

    Lucid Gravity is ~3.5 mi /(kW h) Below: Cybertruck info from above ... to put them all in the same units for comparison.
  15. scottf200

    Poor Level 1 charging efficiency

    The 2+ hrs extra, 66% efficiency, and the battery temperature increased from 18.75-22.25°C to 21.25-25.75°C, indicating some energy was lost as heat.
  16. scottf200

    14-50R Outlet Neutral Bonding

    FYI, this was helpful to me so I thought I'd share the LLM output. }}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}} EGC Potential Rise: "EGC" stands for Equipment Grounding Conductor. If current is flowing through the ground wire, it can cause the voltage of the ground wire to rise above zero. This is dangerous because it...
  17. scottf200

    14-50R Outlet Neutral Bonding

    My response from your TMC that talks about the test in a slightly different way. The common test is:
  18. scottf200

    Tesla Model "Q" teased?

    Good observation. Bottom line on this is price and range as it will likely look like the bland 3 & Y from any normal public eye. Is this the vehicle that was supposed to be built in Mexico? I think Tesla needed to get this out because there are so many Chinese vehicles at a low price and Tesla...
  19. scottf200

    V4 Supercharger (325kW enabled) - 15% to 80% Test

    V3 vs V4 (v4 ped & v3 cab = v3.5) The 325 kW doesn't amount to much at all. At this point in the video (256 kW), their charging curve was virtually the same. It shows 3% diff in that screenshot but most of the time it was 2%.





Top