JHC- get off the “poor Elon” soapbox.They’ll just say Elon bought them off.
Thanks for posting. Interesting that it appears the passenger dash airbag broke the windshield at 6:25 before the frontal impact further fractured it. The other internal shots of the airbag deployment are amazing. Not unique to CT, but still amazing.The report's issue date is Jan 14, 2025 - so before Elon had any possible influence.
Reading the report, it looks like the actual testing was done on 12/18/2024 ... not that that will appease the cyberstuck class of perpetual morons.
Just found this video of the crash test on youtube:
2024-2025 Tesla Cybertruck NHTSA Full-Overlap Frontal Crash Test
Awesome. Looks like they can buff that out. Little bondo and good to go!The report's issue date is Jan 14, 2025 - so before Elon had any possible influence.
Reading the report, it looks like the actual testing was done on 12/18/2024 ... not that that will appease the cyberstuck class of perpetual morons.
Just found this video of the crash test on youtube:
2024-2025 Tesla Cybertruck NHTSA Full-Overlap Frontal Crash Test
The airbag breaking the windshield is a very common thing in all cars.. but yea surprisingly it could get the windshield on the truckThanks for posting. Interesting that it appears the passenger dash airbag broke the windshield at 6:25 before the frontal impact further fractured it. The other internal shots of the airbag deployment are amazing. Not unique to CT, but still amazing.
Battery pack appears completely unscathed. None of the doors could be opened from outside after the impact, which seems less good, presumably the internal mechanical release still worked.
From the actual report: " A 56.3 km/h NCAP Frontal Impact Test was conducted on a 2024 Tesla Cybertruck Beast 4-Door Truck "what about 2024 cyber trucks?
There's no pedestrian test yet.or they will say: passengers are safe but what about pedestrians? ?![]()
That's by design; you don't want them to be forced open when the safety capsule is engaged. You want all the panels to tuck together to provide a shield wall for the passengers... because the impact forces could exceed this point!None of the doors could be opened from outside after the impact, which seems less good, presumably the internal mechanical release still worked.
I RON YMine is actually $4/month lower than my '24 Model Y AWD. Both are under $100/month, but since insurance varies so much by location I still found it interesting it was cheaper than the Y.
haha, I don’t know Crissa. I think even a foam or cardboard truck going at 25 mph could do a serious damage to a pedestrian, irrespective of the angle of the cardboard. People talk about CT’s safety to pedestrians as if other vehicles would hug the pedestrian immediately and save them at any cost! Even a bicycle could do a serious damage to a pedestrian.There's no pedestrian test yet.
The lower drive height would most likely have it score better on some tests than the other North American full-sized trucks. The nose is lower, and in combination with the bumper height, would give more of an incline plane for a pedestrian to hit.
But the best collision is one that never happens, and Tesla scores highly on that, too.
-Crissa
Sure, anything can kill a pedestrian - a fall from standing height can do lethal damage.haha, I don’t know Crissa. I think even a foam or cardboard truck going at 25 mph could do a serious damage to a pedestrian, irrespective of the angle of the cardboard. People talk about CT’s safety to pedestrians as if other vehicles would hug the pedestrian immediately and save them at any cost! Even a bicycle could do a serious damage to a pedestrian.
What would a Modern Day Ralph Nader have to say?"Cybertruck achieves 5-Star Overall Safety Rating from NHTSA, including the lowest overall probability of injury & lowest chance of rollover of any pickup truck tested by NHTSA"
https://www.nhtsa.gov/vehicle/2025/TESLA/CYBERTRUCK%2520(ALL%2520VARIANTS)/PU%252FCC/AWD
![]()