JBee
Well-known member
- First Name
- JB
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2019
- Threads
- 18
- Messages
- 4,913
- Reaction score
- 6,362
- Location
- Australia
- Vehicles
- Cybertruck
- Occupation
- . Professional Hobbyist
It really depends on the motor and drivetrain used, even with Tesla they are not all the same.I don't know, I just know they don't want to do it for long.
There's ways to create dummy loads, shorts, electrical disconnects, and, like on the Semi, an actual clutch. So there's ways to do it. Dummy loads and shorts still create heat and potential, and while you as a driver would be aware if something went wrong in the drive system, someone towing wouldn't.
-Crissa
For example towing a RWD M3 will work without modification, simply because it has an induction motor that doesn't have a permanent magnetic field like a Permanent magnet motor with rare earth metal magnets. This is because an induction motor "induces" a magnetic field using a field controller circuit that can be modulated between a full or no magnetic field. No field equals no power flow. A permanent motor on the other hand, especially high performance versions always have a strong magnetic field from the permanent magnets. They can not be switched off, so to coast you either have to regen or accelerate, and is likely why Tesla switched these to one pedal driving by default. The M3 and MY Dual motors already completely switch off the rear induction motor like this when they cruise or coast, without using a clutch etc, as the front PM motor on them produces the best efficiency for cruise and regen and is a lower power level, and can't be switched off, so it only uses that most of the time. The induction motor is just there for boost essentially, with the PM motor constantly driving or regening off the front wheels.
You must also consider the fact that not all motors perform the same under load and at certain rpm. They are all variables that need to be considered when selecting the gear ratio in reference to the motor efficiency and performance heat map.
Now with the latest proposed "next-gen" motor, they are claiming it has "no" rare earth metals. This either means they have found a novel material to magnetise instead for their PM motors, or more likely, they are simply using an upgraded but cheaper induction motor for it, like they use in the RWD models. Using a CF wrapped induction motor might just be the best version of induction yet, as you get a higher power density, but smaller form factor by being able to get closer rotor clearances at higher rpms. All from a rotor that can't expand through the CF band holding it together, which all in turn reduces flux losses that needs to be extracted as heat. Which also means it has better short term peak performance before overheating.
I'm sort of half expecting the new M3 highlander to have these drive units already, as in the last slide show they had these next gen drivetrain assemblies, with speed controller only cost some $1000 all up. Previously Monroe quotes the Plaid motor alone at $460ea. If they are cheaper and more efficient, you will get more range at lower cost with no extra batteries required, so why not use them if they are ready to go? Alternatively the simpler and safer manufacturing of induction motors , in comparison to more expensive PM ones, let alone "rare earth cost free", means they would even have some change left to put some more batteries in instead.
You can read more about this from Tesla themselves:
https://www.tesla.com/blog/induction-versus-dc-brushless-motors
Sponsored