Inconceivable!

JBee

Well-known member
First Name
JB
Joined
Nov 22, 2019
Threads
18
Messages
4,771
Reaction score
6,147
Location
Australia
Vehicles
Cybertruck
Occupation
. Professional Hobbyist
Country flag
You're just in the wrong business maybe? My "rural" neighbour just bought another 10,000acres for $31m. Grain farming is profitable, even for the employed. Our local mines run $billion dollar profits and have some of the highest paid middle class jobs.
Sponsored

 

JBee

Well-known member
First Name
JB
Joined
Nov 22, 2019
Threads
18
Messages
4,771
Reaction score
6,147
Location
Australia
Vehicles
Cybertruck
Occupation
. Professional Hobbyist
Country flag
You're just in the wrong business maybe? My "rural" neighbour just bought another 10,000acres for $31m. Grain farming is profitable, even for the employed. Our local mines run $billion dollar profits and have some of the highest paid middle class jobs.
 

Diehard

Well-known member
First Name
D
Joined
Dec 5, 2020
Threads
23
Messages
2,127
Reaction score
4,248
Location
U.S.A.
Vehicles
Olds Aurora V8, Saturn Sky redline, Lightning, CT2
Country flag
Not very effectively. It just ends up making you sound mixed up.
Except I didn't say anything like that. I believe in having strong principles, but having different political preferences from the CEO of a company doesn't affect my purchase decisions. And why should it?

I would be far more likely to avoid VW's since they lied about the emissions of their vehicles. But I don't care about the personal or political views of the CEO of VW, nor do I care about the personal views of the rest of management or the people who assembled the car I buy. If I did, I could never buy anything.
This is an attempt to make it sound a little less mixed up by taking humor out of it and answer “why should it?“ question. Chief Executive Officer of a company is not the same as an assembly line worker. He/she makes major decisions that can have major impact on the product, the customer and the shareholders. He or She is also the face of the company and in case of Tesla more so than other companies. If they make judgment and choices that are questionable in one aspects of their life it is reasonable to question where the company is going. For example if Elon cheated on his wife, even if it directly has nothing to do with how Tesla operates, it is reasonable to question if Tesla would do something like VW while he is CEO. I know there are guardrails but VW had those too.

I am not personally aware of all of Elon’s political views and not sure how much of it align with mine. And despite the fact that I do not agree with a few things he did and said, I am still considering CT. Despite the fact that I have many lines I won’t cross, I do not consider myself a STRONG principled man. I am much more likely not to buy a Tesla for choices Tesla has made than Elon’s political view but I completely understand why my wife or @Luke42 ’s wife would not buy one. In a capitalist system, money is the best feedback mechanism. If you don’t like child labor, you stop buying shoes from a company that exploit children. Then the companies that are thinking about it may make different choices. This example is more direct and clear but your money can be used to send feedback to anyone for any reason. And as it was shown in this interview, it has accomplished some of what was intended; Elon did get the message. He did not respond the way those who send the feedback hoped for but he did get it. I see absolutely nothing wrong in a democratic capitalist society with people using their money to vote. Elon is a powerful man. What he thinks matters and trying to influence his thoughts through legal and moral means is reasonable. That is what people with Strong Principals with different political views are doing. Again I personally spend my energy and focus in different areas of my life (not politics) but I understand those that do.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:
 




Top