Cybertruck explosion in Las Vegas; terrorism investigation underway [ADMIN WARNING: NO POLITICS]

[btcrealm]

What I want to know, when we can get the "gravitic propulsion system" for the CT??

Deep in my heart, I knew the empty space in the battery compartment is not for induction charging! ?

ROFL, that's what I said too! "WTF, where is my gravitic cybertruck!!"

My bad... i just saw how long y'all have been trying to steer away from this topic and i just replied. ?

Not your fault, primary instigator and continuing to pull in replies.

Sounds like this soldier wasn’t trying to hurt anyone but himself while bringing attention to his manifesto. That’s the reason he chose the CT and not aluminum scrap like the F-150.

That's a stretch. The guy detonated a bomb (poorly designed bomb, but still a bomb) outside a building and injured bystanders. It's equally likely he thought the Cybertruck would contain the pressure and rupture dramatically, adding it's batteries to the resulting fire. They aren't the actions of some benevolent whistleblower, they're the actions of somebody with serious mental illness at best or truly evil intentions at worst. Based on his manifesto, I veer towards the serious mental illness side.

*IF* the letter is valid and the information piecemeal being released. He likely picked the cybertruck because of its trackability and hardness against attack (may also have just wanted to try one).
The bomb (as technically that is what it is) seems to fit the theatrical concept more so than a destructive concept. Firework mortars for bang and visual, camp fuel for fast burn explosion/release, and gasoline for the maintained burn and smoke. I would be curious if there was diesel there as that would really maintain a burn. Trump tower with a cybertruck also makes sense for news and attention. The firearms as well as there was never the intention beyond likely 1 bullet (maybe to fend off FBI/etc).
PTSD was clearly a thing as well.


The "orgy of evidence" is suspicious. This would align with the other theory that also would be the most logical for an operator of that caliber wanting to disappear. Unfortunately this would also align with government agencies doing a psyop or making a statement to our special operations.

Like I said before I don't think we will get a good answer out of this...

I don't think there will be a good answer on the outcome of this.

The biggest frustration about this coverage/level of attention is that the actual tragedy in NO has not been getting the recognition it should be. Unfortunately the statement was correct. Guns, explosions, cybertruck/Elon, Trump have taken the news by storm....

Sponsored

 

[CyberGus]

ROFL, that's what I said too! "WTF, where is my gravitic cybertruck!!"

 

[rlhamil]

Want more information?

Then If you have some time and are on X Read the guy's manifesto here...

@shawnryan762 video interview with @samosaur



This is some crazy mind-blowing tin foil hat stuff ... Oh, and let's throw some drones in just for fun.

What I want to know, when we can get the "gravitic propulsion system" for the CT??

If you're going there, I want the flux capacitor too. Although I'd also need either a Mr. Fusion or a 1.21 gigawatt supercharger.

 

[KevinCh]

I’m not making a comment or judgement. Just sharing an interesting take.

 

[JBee]

Ok, if the drones/war crimes story was really the same guy, he had another stress on him (if the war crimes part is true), and another indication of brokenness (because gravitic propulsion is probably impossible, far beyond what any physicist or inventor knows how to do, and incompatible with observations of mostly conventional drones - I don't know most of the math, but I do follow exotic physics papers; therefore indeed in the tinfoil hat category).

Ball lightning is real and documented. Google is your friend feel free to explore the below in detail. (on this occasion at least).

I actually just missed experiencing one first hand at my friends house by a few seconds, came in through the glass sliding door and dissipated inside, only lasted 5-10 seconds or so. My family saw it as well, all of whom haven't even heard of it, me included at the time. I could still smell the air ionisation and feel the charge on my skin and hair when I entered the house. Everyone was quite unsettled by it and I immediately knew something was up when I came in the door.

Creating plasma balls is also not hard, but "self sustaining" ones are harder.

Try cutting a grape in half so the skin is still connecting the halves, and put it in the microwave with a glass of water next to it. Turn the microwave on for 30seconds. Its quite fun to watch the high frequency microwaves generate a plasma arcs over the grape.

Once you have generated one its possible to steer it like Tesla did with his remote control boats aka the first known "drones". I played with one of his models at a Tesla exhibit at a museum once, which worked by manipulating the EM field (no not Elon! ) on one side of a dipole antenna arrangement. A tuned dipole also allows for energy to be transferred between antennas at high efficiency (sometimes too high!), and in the case of the Tesla remote control exhibit, transferred energy wirelessly to drive the model boat from the stand's power supply. This could be turned off and on with a switch that powered a tesla coil and dipole, and directional control was achieved by rotating the stand's dipole antenna, which in turn forced the boat dipole to rotate in response to the changing field orientation, and this rotation of the boat antenna was mechanically coupled to the boats rudder. Control was simply turn on power for propulsion and then steer using a rotating knob. No electronics, servos, radios, microcontrollers or batteries required. Quite elegant avantgarde hi-tech from the early 1900's.

Note that plasma, being the 4th state of matter, moving through the air it is very lightweight (nearly massless in comparison to air) so steering it in 3D at high velocities and accelerations is fairly trivial and doesn't require "breaking physics" to do so. This is not the same as "other" flying vehicles that can transport physical objects, this is just a visible field phenomenon, that can interact with matter, like well...also naturally occurring ball shaped lightning.

For example: Fluorescent light bulbs also use plasma in the tube to make UV that excites the phosphorus coating inside the tube to make visible light.

These balls of plasma are similar, in that you can't see what is maintaining or propelling them, because it is out of the visible human spectrum, just like UV, but where they coalesce into a plasma ball they start to emit visible light which you can see, especially at night where they contrast against the sky.

Think of it as a very lightweight movable light source that can move at the speed of radio waves. You're the cat, its the red laser pointer dot you see and don't know where it comes from, which can move erratically and very fast.

Now "heavy" or manned versions would be feasible as well provided you had a big enough power source to overcome inertia, either mechanically or artificially by other means. For this you need to use field theory and ditch high school particle theory though, and reorient your perception of mass into realising that even solids are mostly hollow in the first place. Then consider Newtons first law (energy conservation) and then think of plasma as a "tap" to the underlying field that permeates everything (or stored energy dam) where it can be released through, if you provide a path for a potential difference.

For example: Lightning is not caused by "clouds rubbing together' like commonly believed, but rather differential charge generated in the electric field that is discharged though a plasma (observed as lightning) created between a potential difference aka a tap. Plasmas are also conductors, which in turn means they can be used as antennae themselves, hence their self induced EM propagation properties. (ie they can absorb external charge and make them visible - in reality though balls can exist everywhere that are not in the visible spectrum)

Now given the above, the nature of the content of the emails might be not as crazy as they first seem, and would only serve to invigorate the false narrative around what they are, and who is responsible for what.

What is "factual" is not as important as how the public perceive it, by intentional deception of the underlying reality you can control the perceived reality people share and communicate. Hence the understanding of reality is limited by your own experience and perception of it, and by your previous programming by others with influence, that dictate how you perceive.

Example: how can you perceive or communicate the properties of Fulvous, if you have never learnt the properties of that colour, or have had to communicate those properties to others, or others communicate it with you?

 

[rlhamil]

Ball lightning is real and documented. Google is your friend feel free to explore the below in detail. (on this occasion at least).

I actually just missed experiencing one first hand at my friends house by a few seconds, came in through the glass sliding door and dissipated inside, only lasted 5-10 seconds or so. My family saw it as well, all of whom haven't even heard of it, me included at the time. I could still smell the air ionisation and feel the charge on my skin and hair when I entered the house. Everyone was quite unsettled by it and I immediately knew something was up when I came in the door.

Creating plasma balls is also not hard, but "self sustaining" ones are harder.

Try cutting a grape in half so the skin is still connecting the halves, and put it in the microwave with a glass of water next to it. Turn the microwave on for 30seconds. Its quite fun to watch the high frequency microwaves generate a plasma arcs over the grape.

Once you have generated one its possible to steer it like Tesla did with his remote control boats aka the first known "drones". I played with one of his models at a Tesla exhibit at a museum once, which worked by manipulating the EM field (no not Elon! ) on one side of a dipole antenna arrangement. A tuned dipole also allows for energy to be transferred between antennas at high efficiency (sometimes too high!), and in the case of the Tesla remote control exhibit, transferred energy wirelessly to drive the model boat from the stand's power supply. This could be turned off and on with a switch that powered a tesla coil and dipole, and directional control was achieved by rotating the stand's dipole antenna, which in turn forced the boat dipole to rotate in response to the changing field orientation, and this rotation of the boat antenna was mechanically coupled to the boats rudder. Control was simply turn on power for propulsion and then steer using a rotating knob. No electronics, servos, radios, microcontrollers or batteries required. Quite elegant avantgarde hi-tech from the early 1900's.

Note that plasma, being the 4th state of matter, moving through the air it is very lightweight (nearly massless in comparison to air) so steering it in 3D at high velocities and accelerations is fairly trivial and doesn't require "breaking physics" to do so. This is not the same as "other" flying vehicles that can transport physical objects, this is just a visible field phenomenon, that can interact with matter, like well...also naturally occurring ball shaped lightning.

For example: Fluorescent light bulbs also use plasma in the tube to make UV that excites the phosphorus coating inside the tube to make visible light.

These balls of plasma are similar, in that you can't see what is maintaining or propelling them, because it is out of the visible human spectrum, just like UV, but where they coalesce into a plasma ball they start to emit visible light which you can see, especially at night where they contrast against the sky.

Think of it as a very lightweight movable light source that can move at the speed of radio waves. You're the cat, its the red laser pointer dot you see and don't know where it comes from, which can move erratically and very fast.

Now "heavy" or manned versions would be feasible as well provided you had a big enough power source to overcome inertia, either mechanically or artificially by other means. For this you need to use field theory and ditch high school particle theory though, and reorient your perception of mass into realising that even solids are mostly hollow in the first place. Then consider Newtons first law (energy conservation) and then think of plasma as a "tap" to the underlying field that permeates everything (or stored energy dam) where it can be released through, if you provide a path for a potential difference.

For example: Lightning is not caused by "clouds rubbing together' like commonly believed, but rather differential charge generated in the electric field that is discharged though a plasma (observed as lightning) created between a potential difference aka a tap. Plasmas are also conductors, which in turn means they can be used as antennae themselves, hence their self induced EM propagation properties. (ie they can absorb external charge and make them visible - in reality though balls can exist everywhere that are not in the visible spectrum)

Now given the above, the nature of the content of the emails might be not as crazy as they first seem, and would only serve to invigorate the false narrative around what they are, and who is responsible for what.

What is "factual" is not as important as how the public perceive it, by intentional deception of the underlying reality you can control the perceived reality people share and communicate. Hence the understanding of reality is limited by your own experience and perception of it, and by your previous programming by others with influence, that dictate how you perceive.

Example: how can you perceive or communicate the properties of Fulvous, if you have never learnt the properties of that colour, or have had to communicate those properties to others, or others communicate it with you?

Plasma thrusters exist. Per the Wikipedia article on them, one example was "The VX-200 engine, for example, requires 200 kW electrical power to produce 5 N of thrust, or 40 kW/N." 5 N of thrust is about 1.12 lbs, not useful except in outer space (where it could be useful because it could be sustained for a long time, ultimately reaching high speeds). 200kw is about the best my Cybertruck usually charges at, although twice that should be possible for part of the charge curve on a fully functional V4 charger. That's enough to power 5-10 houses, more or less. There is NO compact lightweight source of that much power presently available.

Controlling a plasma ball at a significant distance (at least a few hundred meters, say) from the plasma ball is not remotely feasible. Building a device with sophisticated capabilities entirely out of plasma is pushing it even for sci-fi, let alone reality; the energy required to hold its complex structure together would have to come from somewhere.

The previous commenter, unless they can cite a paper in a respected peer-reviewed publication and show the math, is engaging in, to be kind, imaginative technobabble. As was likely the brain injured soldier, if that email is legit. He also thought he was being pursued, which he almost certainly wasn't. So he was a bit paranoid, too,

 

[JBee]

Plasma thrusters exist. Per the Wikipedia article on them, one example was "The VX-200 engine, for example, requires 200 kW electrical power to produce 5 N of thrust, or 40 kW/N." 5 N of thrust is about 1.12 lbs, not useful except in outer space (where it could be useful because it could be sustained for a long time, ultimately reaching high speeds). 200kw is about the best my Cybertruck usually charges at, although twice that should be possible for part of the charge curve on a fully functional V4 charger. That's enough to power 5-10 houses, more or less. There is NO compact lightweight source of that much power presently available.

Controlling a plasma ball at a significant distance (at least a few hundred meters, say) from the plasma ball is not remotely feasible. Building a device with sophisticated capabilities entirely out of plasma is pushing it even for sci-fi, let alone reality; the energy required to hold its complex structure together would have to come from somewhere.

The previous commenter, unless they can cite a paper in a respected peer-reviewed publication and show the math, is engaging in, to be kind, imaginative technobabble. As was likely the brain injured soldier, if that email is legit. He also thought he was being pursued, which he almost certainly wasn't. So he was a bit paranoid, too,

I'd give what I wrote another read if you can, to fully understand what I'm presenting.

You can create a decent visible plasma with a grape in a microwave as explained above, using a few hundred watts of microwaves that are not focused (they're randomly bouncing around the inside). It's really just a easy way for you to try it at home. You can also make a really bright plasma using a incandescent light bulb with a broken filament, in a microwave, but only use torgether with a cup of water to absorb the extra microwaves for 2-3 seconds, as this can destroy your magnetron.

For the plasma balls though the energy source is on the ground, a simple set of antennae is sufficient to transmit the energy required to generate the plasma ball anywhere within 3D space, within range of the antenna used. The plasma ball itself is the antenna to recieve the energy, because plasma is conductive. (You can also get plasma antennas that can optimally tune in realtime to wavelength for better reception aka energy absorption)

There is no craft or energy source inside the artificial "plasma ball lightning" being discussed so no thrust is required to move mass. These also occurs naturally, like lightning or on high voltage installations, where the high voltage potential creates an plasma arc. You can also by plasma torches that can cut through steel etc using a household outlet as their power source.

There is also no source of energy inside natural occuring lightning itself, as this is created between the differences in charge in the atmosphere/ground.

In artificially made plasma balls, the charge differential is created externally by focusing radio waves to a single point, by antenna on the ground with ground mounted generation that powers it.

If there is no craft, there can also not be any energy source "onboard", because there is nothing to be onboard with. It's just a very lightweight nearly empty plasma "craft" that emits visible light.

Accordingly, if there is only a plasma, it's also extremely lightweight and requires little energy to move, so no high energy density source is required for a nearly massless object, that would be pointless.

Essentially it only needs to create visible lighting for desired effect, and then move that lighting effect to different locations. Exaclty like with a laser pointer where the laser cannot be seen until it is reflected off a surface back to your eyes.

Likewise the plasma ball is the laser dot you see, but not the laser source, or the energy source powering it.

Once the above can be accepted we can carry on to the next variations on how this could be used.

BTW a Supercharger is not an energy "source" or generator, just a point of access to energy distribution.

Thanks.

 

[rlhamil]

I know what a Supercharger is and isn't, thanks; obviously it's not a power plant. And you still can't control the motion of your plasma ball at any significant distance. Nor could it do anything useful except put on a show, or maybe some damage if run into something, or generating some radio interference.

So it's not something anyone would mistake for a 99% of drones or UAPs/UFOs/whatever.

Could some tiny fraction of mystery flying objects be natural or artificial ball lightning? Maybe. But there's darn little purpose to doing it on purpose. And natural phenomena wouldn't gather around nuclear plants or naval vessels. It's not advanced physics, and it's not little green (or grey) men either, it's nasty humans up to no good, along with a lot of mistaken sightings of harmless things. The bad guy ones are likely intelligence collection rather than weapons, although they could of course also carry something small but very nasty.

Natural ball lightning rarely lasts more than a bit over a minute, usually only a few seconds. And there's a variety of theories about how it works, but none widely agreed on.

(these are all things I've been interested in for some time, so it's not like I haven't heard it all before, both serious and BS, mostly BS)

Super duper secrets don't last more than a few years, maybe a decade at the most; aside from someone inevitably revealing what they're not supposed to (I HATE leakers, had to spend 24 hours changing passwords because of one I won't name), there's the problem that if you use something enough, it WILL be possible for someone serious to see it, examine it, analyze it. Imagining that high drama secrets can last much longer is conspiracy theory.

 

[JBee]

Cool, cool. ?

A couple of usage possibilities;

Putting some heat and a ignition source, like plasma balls inside or near hazardous atmospheres like fuel tanks, engines etc can lead to catastrophic failures, provided it is enclosed with fairly RF transparent materials.

Electronic interference, and knocking out GPS/Comms or weapons tracking, guidance or countermeasures is fairly substantial, especially so if using two or more antennae allow accurate triangulation even in a GPS denied environment. Remember the symptoms of that Bermuda one?
Low voltage CPU's also don't like HV spikes at all, and even if going against a RF hardened device can at least take out critical sensors etc like a precision EMP. They could also potentially be used for RF surveillance by monitoring the plasma resonance feedback.

Air defence decoys also work as they are visible on radar if you want them to be. Contact with biology can also lead to burns, temporary blindness and electroshock, nearby munitions could also be triggered etc.

If you can move them fast, you should also be able to generate new balls and get them into a conflict zone very fast, you know like machine gun fast, but each individually precision guided, and they don't need to be manufactured or reloaded etc etc. Which at a minimum would be demoralising, distracting and a waste of resources to identify and counteract, especially if you can't distinguish between a real threat or not, and would easily overwhelm conventional systems by shear onslaught of endless numbers of them.

As for their origin, I'd say some are naturally occurring (which in itself is interesting how they come about at all), but most of them are likely artificially man made, which would explain why they are also "interested" in manmade locations as well. But RF sources might just naturally attract them too. It's sometimes amusing to consider why aliens are always identified by different colours, rather than some outlandish physical trait as a consequence of their home planet. Some of the secrecy is achieved by trivialisation, but as with most secrets it's actually because the truth is often best hid in plain sight, and mocking credibility is a much easier way to maintain control of what people believe, especially until now with MSM, because individuals simply lacked the reach to make it common knowledge.

RE: range and how long they last, even 10-15seconds at Mach 3 is 10-15km and at Mach 6 (no aerodynamic drag because it doesn't displace much, if any air) you'd then have a coverage dome as large as line of sight on the ground. There's also the possibility to start them small and only expand them on target by increasing the transmission power late. Note these wouldn't be omnidirectional broadcast antennae, rather point to point directional phased arrays and could be potentially built into existing radar systems.

Anyways, some fun things to ponder on the CT forum...back to normal transmission. lol.

 

[rlhamil]

Cool, cool. ?

A couple of usage possibilities;

Putting some heat and a ignition source, like plasma balls inside or near hazardous atmospheres like fuel tanks, engines etc can lead to catastrophic failures, provided it is enclosed with fairly RF transparent materials.

Electronic interference, and knocking out GPS/Comms or weapons tracking, guidance or countermeasures is fairly substantial, especially so if using two or more antennae allow accurate triangulation even in a GPS denied environment. Remember the symptoms of that Bermuda one?
Low voltage CPU's also don't like HV spikes at all, and even if going against a RF hardened device can at least take out critical sensors etc like a precision EMP. They could also potentially be used for RF surveillance by monitoring the plasma resonance feedback.

Air defence decoys also work as they are visible on radar if you want them to be. Contact with biology can also lead to burns, temporary blindness and electroshock, nearby munitions could also be triggered etc.

If you can move them fast, you should also be able to generate new balls and get them into a conflict zone very fast, you know like machine gun fast, but each individually precision guided, and they don't need to be manufactured or reloaded etc etc. Which at a minimum would be demoralising, distracting and a waste of resources to identify and counteract, especially if you can't distinguish between a real threat or not, and would easily overwhelm conventional systems by shear onslaught of endless numbers of them.

As for their origin, I'd say some are naturally occurring (which in itself is interesting how they come about at all), but most of them are likely artificially man made, which would explain why they are also "interested" in manmade locations as well. But RF sources might just naturally attract them too. It's sometimes amusing to consider why aliens are always identified by different colours, rather than some outlandish physical trait as a consequence of their home planet. Some of the secrecy is achieved by trivialisation, but as with most secrets it's actually because the truth is often best hid in plain sight, and mocking credibility is a much easier way to maintain control of what people believe, especially until now with MSM, because individuals simply lacked the reach to make it common knowledge.

RE: range and how long they last, even 10-15seconds at Mach 3 is 10-15km and at Mach 6 (no aerodynamic drag because it doesn't displace much, if any air) you'd then have a coverage dome as large as line of sight on the ground. There's also the possibility to start them small and only expand them on target by increasing the transmission power late. Note these wouldn't be omnidirectional broadcast antennae, rather point to point directional phased arrays and could be potentially built into existing radar systems.

Anyways, some fun things to ponder on the CT forum...back to normal transmission. lol.

More hooey. Direct contact damage, maybe. Ball lightning is most often not said to be hot, except when it collapses/ends. Emitted RF doesn't come from magic, but takes energy and would rapidly drain a plasma ball sort of object.

No natural ball lighting travels at high speeds. A plasma ball is NOT analogous to the spot from a laser pointer, which is just a reflection, and not a thing in itself at all; such a spot can appear to move faster than light over a long enough distance, but nothing is really moving. A plasma ball is physical and has a continuity limited by inertia, not just a focus of remote energy, so it CANNOT move absurdly fast or be remote controlled over distances to be a useful weapon or entertaining UFO.

Aliens and advanced weaponry are movies and hallucinations and wishful thinking. Doubtless aliens exist...many light years away, probably more than would have enabled them to detect human activity. And we're boring, arrogant, and stupid, not worth their time even if they could. And high drama breakthroughs DO NOT EVER remain secret for decades. Roswell was Project Mogul, balloon borne monitoring of Soviet nuclear tests, not very effective, not breakthrough, not even dramatic except due to how it was covered up. Indeed, it's just about an object lesson that if there are long lasting dramatic rumors, what's ultimately behind them is not particularly dramatic at all. At worst, the dramatic is a coverup for the non-dramatic.

Real conspiracies are BORING...or they wouldn't work. Like someone giving someone else (also a US official, not a foreign spy, just running an amateurish operation of their own) equipment that they're not entitled to, eventually getting caught and losing their job for it. That would be about the only one I've seen in a long time of seeing things people don't hear about. If I'd seen more from higher up, there would be a few others. But they're almost uniformly venial (or somewhat worse), but far less than imagined.

If it's dramatic, it's probably BS, period. Especially if you can't prove it.

 

[BannedByTMC]

Like I said before I don't think we will get a good answer out of this...

Occam's razor. We have the answer.

 

[DrPhyzx]

Cool, cool. ?

A couple of usage possibilities;

Putting some heat and a ignition source, like plasma balls inside or near hazardous atmospheres like fuel tanks, engines etc can lead to catastrophic failures, provided it is enclosed with fairly RF transparent materials.

Electronic interference, and knocking out GPS/Comms or weapons tracking, guidance or countermeasures is fairly substantial, especially so if using two or more antennae allow accurate triangulation even in a GPS denied environment. Remember the symptoms of that Bermuda one?
Low voltage CPU's also don't like HV spikes at all, and even if going against a RF hardened device can at least take out critical sensors etc like a precision EMP. They could also potentially be used for RF surveillance by monitoring the plasma resonance feedback.

Air defence decoys also work as they are visible on radar if you want them to be. Contact with biology can also lead to burns, temporary blindness and electroshock, nearby munitions could also be triggered etc.

If you can move them fast, you should also be able to generate new balls and get them into a conflict zone very fast, you know like machine gun fast, but each individually precision guided, and they don't need to be manufactured or reloaded etc etc. Which at a minimum would be demoralising, distracting and a waste of resources to identify and counteract, especially if you can't distinguish between a real threat or not, and would easily overwhelm conventional systems by shear onslaught of endless numbers of them.

As for their origin, I'd say some are naturally occurring (which in itself is interesting how they come about at all), but most of them are likely artificially man made, which would explain why they are also "interested" in manmade locations as well. But RF sources might just naturally attract them too. It's sometimes amusing to consider why aliens are always identified by different colours, rather than some outlandish physical trait as a consequence of their home planet. Some of the secrecy is achieved by trivialisation, but as with most secrets it's actually because the truth is often best hid in plain sight, and mocking credibility is a much easier way to maintain control of what people believe, especially until now with MSM, because individuals simply lacked the reach to make it common knowledge.

RE: range and how long they last, even 10-15seconds at Mach 3 is 10-15km and at Mach 6 (no aerodynamic drag because it doesn't displace much, if any air) you'd then have a coverage dome as large as line of sight on the ground. There's also the possibility to start them small and only expand them on target by increasing the transmission power late. Note these wouldn't be omnidirectional broadcast antennae, rather point to point directional phased arrays and could be potentially built into existing radar systems.

Anyways, some fun things to ponder on the CT forum...back to normal transmission. lol.

Send me $1M and I'll design a ball lightning transporter beam for your CT.

 

[Cyber Man]

I believe anything is possible in science, but I also believe in things that are published in scientific literature peer reviewed by scientists. To accomplish the technology that’s in this guy’s manifesto, quantum computing is needed. Humans haven’t done a sustainable breakthrough there. Achieving anti-gravity propulsion system will put us at a whole new ring of civilization. We wouldn’t even need fuel rockets anymore. Tesla might be the first one to get us there, and they are still trying to figure out how to catch fuel rockets in mid air! By the time anti-gravity is built in a stable and viable way, the computer and AI system would be so advanced that we might even know how to bend space and time to create time travel wormholes. All these things are theoretically possible, but practically hard to achieve with the current expertise, computing power, and energy source. The very reason AI became so powerful in the last two years is because of computing power. Otherwise, the concept and prototypes existed since decades. Matrix movie was released in 1999. Think about it.

As much as I want to see these technologies come to fruition, I’m not buying that these things exist as of today. If someone like Einstein can outpace quantum computers to create new theories that are vetted by the scientific communities, these things might be achievable sooner than later. Until then, all these things are paranoid assumptions. It wouldn’t take much for any government in the world to falsely leak a document saying they have developed this system. All sorts of shit stories circulate in global politics to keep the power. Some are true and some are pure bluff. You won’t know the truth till you see things in action, such as what happened in Japan during World War II.

 

[dalton108]

Send me $1M and I'll design a ball lightning transporter beam for your CT.

All right, well that settles that. Thanks Doc.

 

[Balthezor]

Sponsored