Search results

I have not. It's a data source with valid points. I have no "feelings" on the subject, I'm looking for impartial facts, unlike your quoted emotional rant above. Also, in case you are unaware, I'm a TSLA investor with thousands of shares even after selling over half of them, I want the...

CT is rated for 11K lbs, and the G forces of a pothole can multiply the forces, as explained in this section of the video:

ChatGPT doesn't know as much as your average Tesla enthusiast: Irrelevant, the discussion is not about the body panels. They are however attached to aluminum castings. It's not "likely" it's a fact that the CT uses a cast aluminum frame section. ChatGPT is not the final authority some...

Doesn't traveling downhill in my scenario raise the CG? And don't you have to add in the trailer height above the axle as well?

Imagine the trailer by itself traveling down the road, what happens when it applies it's brakes? The tongue will be forced down. Trailer brakes do not eliminate that force.

It's not, as was explained in the video. A high CG load, going down hill, hitting the brakes, and a pothole at the same time, is not impossible. Think of a trailer with a 10k lb excavator, that would have a high CG.

Everyone else on the road would prefer the trailer stay attached to the tow vehicle, not become "decoupled" flying down the road on it's own. There is a reason trailers have safety chains as backups for the hitch coupler. Your attempted line of "reasoning" is insane.

Read mongo's posts.

But that's not what's being discussed, it's the safety factor rating.

Maybe you missed this previous post of mine:

I was probably on TMC before you even knew what Tesla was. Just because you didn't find my input valuable doesn't mean others felt the same way. I find your uncritical fanboying mind numbingly repetitive and uninformative, others have expressed the same opinions of you as well.

The YouTuber talked with OEM truck engineers about their testing and the ratings they use.

You're so far from the "nail" you aren't even in the same universe. As previously discussed I had a CT reservation and cancelled it because I no longer want one, why you would imagine that as being "jealous" speaks volumes about you. No I wasn't banned for being negative, I was banned...

This thread is about a video which covers much of that.

One proved my point, no need for me to list all the others of which you are likely aware. Except that you kinda implied it with It's known as an "appeal to authority fallacy".

You mean these people? https://www.cybertruckownersclub.com/forum/threads/cybertruck-stainless-panels-are-falling-off-is-this-a-new-phenomena.35832/ One might think that building rockets is not the same as building vehicles...

The critiques raised in the video were real and accurate, if they ever show up in real world use is another matter. The fact remains that steel framed trucks have a higher margin built into them than the CT because of the use of aluminum. No amount of blind fan-boying will change that simple fact.

Wow, you're right, I mean all those Tesla engineers have never designed a part that was subject to a recall, right? Right? Yeah....

Completely unrelated use profiles and materials.

He directly talked about center of gravity in the video. Yes there is a large difference with a higher center of gravity.