In a conversation which was relayed to me, a Tesla employee was complaining that they wouldnāt be able to jump the line to get their truck. I know typically some employees do, but sounds like itās far from universal.
I donāt think anyone is on record using the term exoskeleton design or exoskeleton frame prior to the Cybertruck. I havenāt researched this, but I doubt it.
Iām pretty sure Munro adopted the term after Musk used it to describe the Cybertruck.
Poor title choice.
Like I said, Barons track record plus shit title === ogre donāt read it.
Considering the title gets 90% of the play, this is a low brow way for an editor to turn a positive story into a crappy headline.
āThe Edsel, named after Edsel Ford, the son of Henry Ford, is the notorious automotive failure, the one that stands out above the rest.ā
You have a different idea of what positive is than I do.
Barons has been increasingly anti Tesla for some time.
Given the fact that excitement over the truck has only increased as itās gotten closer, I donāt think the flop is goin hot happen. Or if it does, not in the way the Edsel did.
There is certainly much truth here. But it wonāt take 150k deliveries to get to chuck in Kansas. There will be a train going to Kansas City within the first 50,000 deliveries, Tesla wants them seen and talked about. Canāt have buzz if you donāt have presence.
Musk used aircraft as an example of how the Cybertruck integrated structure and the skin of the vehicle.
Nobody in the AUTO industry has used the term exoskeleton either so people arguing over whether the Cybertruck does or doesnāt match the definition of the term when itās never been used in...
I donāt think any of the competition has a screen like the typical Tesla screen.
Also, none of those companies seem to give 2 shakes about actual safety so if the middle seat passenger gets a face full of glass, they donāt care. Tesla seems to actually care about that and very likely would not...
I agree.
I just donāt see the solution as cut and dried as you do.
Itās one of those places where unintended consequences often kicks in and we end up with taxpayers bailing out billionaires who have beach homes in Florida.
I know weāre way off your original comment and Iām not suggesting...
While I agree about trash, I donāt think itās the same.
Increased insurance costs motivate people to make better choices. If a place is a high fire danger location, it should be more expensive to insure.
Oddball thought. Instead of having a bank of outlets inside the bed, what if the Cybertruck comes with or has an optional dongle that comes out of the NACS port.
Similar but much more capable than the one on the Hyundai.
Insurance companies make a profit based on how good they are at evaluating risk.
Thus places with higher fire danger have higher homer insurance premiums. Lots of people donāt like this idea, but thatās literally the business model.