Search results

The front seats are not to bad, the back seat headroom is limited. Demographic wise men purchase far more trucks than women, and in general men are taler than women so the complaints about headroom are understandable. No reason Tesla would design the core of the vehicle to needlessly eat up...

Yea the value of the current CTs are going to drop, they have been going down but recently really dropped and assume the discovery of the upcoming pack size doubling has a lot to do with it.

Yea, some people have zero clue how cheap batteries have gotten recently, the price reduction is drastic and the doubling of the battery size will be cheaper than the bed consuming battery which will likely not be sold.

Room for 2x larger battery. OR A huge design flaw by one of the most talented design teams in the world. My $ through stock investment is on Elon making good on his 500+ range promise.

Great report, awesome pics. What a nightmare on the HVAC side. Having that rear window not roll down was such a cheapout.

Except in this case you can't see inside the jar and the larger jar is a problem. Bigger battery and range coming.

If you look at the other Tesla packs compared to the CT it will become immediately obvious that the space left in this pack is significant, and substantially more. A common complaint about the CT is the lack of headroom, this is directly due to this pack height. Makes no sense to cut headroom...

Sandy has a lengthy video out, pretty obvious if you have watched it.

Are you familiar with Tesla? :) It was pretty obvious once the pack size being half of what it could be, no sense in building it that way and reducing head height in the cab unless you are planning to increase capacity. The statemen from Wes was just additional, 500+ mile CT is coming.

11307xxxx and counting

Wes is a smart guy, fits in well with the Tesla culture, and would have everything to lose and nothing to gain by trolling truck buyers and stockholders. You can tell the gravity and reality of it by the reactions of the usual Tesla commenting folks.

Pretty close between the two trucks............until the CT gets the battery pack size doubled, then no contest.

No beast shows late 2024

We think we have another plausible explanation, so now we have at least 3 possibilities. Hopefully original poster will shed some light on it.

All true and correct, but one thing you missed. The CyberTRUCK can tow things with a more respectable battery pack, the current range of 90 miles is not towing, there are a lot of superchargers but not THAT many, and very few with pull throughs. They made a truck, they need to make it do Truck...

That is fair as some people not familiar with Tesla may not know who Wes is. On a Tesla product forum I just assumed most would know who he was and fully describing each component would turn a short post into a book. But you are correct. Wes Morrill is a hardware and development engineer who...

Don't expect a response, they are taking the buyers with the least resistance currently because they have a long line, experienced the same thing with my wife's Model X. Grab another reservation.

Considering to get it there he had to buy it in the aftermarket and get it there, I don't think he is worried about Superchargers :)

Built in the space for it, and Wes confirmed it was "half full" other. Not going to get much more confirmation than that out of Tesla, but it is coming.

They need an option/retrofit so the 10k Foundation Series people do not bring out pitchforks. Offering the range extender "someday" that will likely never come gives then at least the option to get FS owners the same 600+ miles. Brought up by Sandy Monroe, confirmed by Wes Morrill, see image...