Actual efficiency versus onscreen reported efficiency.

[DMSTR]

My window sticker shows average power consumption rating is 46 kWhs used per 100 miles.
My onboard analytics (photo attached) shows 391.6 WH/mi being my current 100 mile average.

How is consuming 39.16 kWhs per 100 miles displayed as using 18.2 WH more per mile than the truck's rating?
Shouldn't it show that I'm using almost 7 less than the rating?

I pasted this into an AI chat also. It said:

Rated Consumption: 46 kWh per 100 miles translates to 460 Wh per mile.​

Your Reported Consumption: 391.6 Wh per mile translates to 39.16 kWh per 100 miles.​

This means you are consuming 68.4 Wh less per mile than the rated consumption, not more.​

Has anyone heard anything about the onboard analytics being off? I mean obviously they are but just wondering. Thanks

Sponsored

 

[mongo]

My window sticker shows average power consumption rating is 46 kWhs used per 100 miles.
My onboard analytics (photo attached) shows 391.6 WH/mi being my current 100 mile average.

How is consuming 39.16 kWhs per 100 miles displayed as using 18.2 WH more per mile than the truck's rating?
Shouldn't it show that I'm using almost 7 less than the rating?

I pasted this into an AI chat also. It said:

Rated Consumption: 46 kWh per 100 miles translates to 460 Wh per mile.​

Your Reported Consumption: 391.6 Wh per mile translates to 39.16 kWh per 100 miles.​

This means you are consuming 68.4 Wh less per mile than the rated consumption, not more.​

Has anyone heard anything about the onboard analytics being off? I mean obviously they are but just wondering. Thanks

Sticker consumption is energy from the wall so includes charging losses. In vehicle is based on energy used driving.
373.4 Wh/mile (391.6 - 18.2) is 329 mile range. AWD with Core wheels is rated at 325 or ~378Wh/mile.