FutureBoy
Well-known member
- First Name
- Reginald
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2020
- Threads
- 215
- Messages
- 3,557
- Reaction score
- 6,063
- Location
- Kirkland WA USA
- Vehicles
- Toyota Sienna
- Occupation
- Financial Advisor
- Thread starter
- #1
At AI day, Tesla went into detail about how the vehicle cameras get read, then translated into a 360-degree vector space view before getting used by FSD for further processing.
Now this makes me wonder about what views will be used for various other uses. For instance, what will be shown in the dashboard screen when backing up? Or the expected screens used as rear/side view mirrors? What will be recorded on the Teslacam videos?
I'm not really sure what I would prefer or really need for these uses. But one thing that got me thinking about this was from watching the Wham Bam Teslacam videos. Very often, the commentary in the video mentions that someone provided the Teslacam video to either the police or to an insurance company to help determine fault and/or responsibility.
I would expect that the 360-degree video would be easier to see and understand when watching these videos. However, the 360-degree video is highly processed and I can imagine a lawyer saying in court that the Teslacam footage is not really what happened because it does not show the actual raw footage from the cameras. For all the court knows, the FSD computer processing could have interpolated something incorrectly and created a whole different scenario of what happened than the actual real-life events.
I'm curious which videos you think will be on the Teslacam output. And how admissible in court you think the 360-degree video might be.
Now this makes me wonder about what views will be used for various other uses. For instance, what will be shown in the dashboard screen when backing up? Or the expected screens used as rear/side view mirrors? What will be recorded on the Teslacam videos?
I'm not really sure what I would prefer or really need for these uses. But one thing that got me thinking about this was from watching the Wham Bam Teslacam videos. Very often, the commentary in the video mentions that someone provided the Teslacam video to either the police or to an insurance company to help determine fault and/or responsibility.
I would expect that the 360-degree video would be easier to see and understand when watching these videos. However, the 360-degree video is highly processed and I can imagine a lawyer saying in court that the Teslacam footage is not really what happened because it does not show the actual raw footage from the cameras. For all the court knows, the FSD computer processing could have interpolated something incorrectly and created a whole different scenario of what happened than the actual real-life events.
I'm curious which videos you think will be on the Teslacam output. And how admissible in court you think the 360-degree video might be.
Sponsored