anionic1
Well-known member
- First Name
- Michael
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2021
- Threads
- 29
- Messages
- 1,666
- Reaction score
- 2,014
- Location
- California
- Vehicles
- Cybertruck
- Occupation
- Estimator
One thing that definitely sides with your arguments is that they seem to have gotten rid of the sail pillar storage which is definitely necessary to use that SS panel to strengthen the casting. I wish I had more experience with industrial adhesives. I am really curious how long that bond can take stress and strain before it degrades to the point where it can't handle the loads. I do get a little concerned about the trend of gluing parts together that are under constant stress/strain fluctuation, but i hope Tesla knows what they are doing. Many buildings are held together with epoxy so i guess its fine.I believe this is incorrect
I’ll post a better explanation for it later, but for now:
If the SS isn’t performing some substantive structural support, there’s no way the aluminum castings and can frame will accomplish the CT’s payload/towing/offroad capabilities
Assuming Tesla will meet those specs, it entails that the SS is performing structural support
This means, contra to your point about the doors, the strongest SS panels need to be the front and rear quarter panels (which span the interior frame segments)
I suppose they would get value still from 2mm SS performing this structural work, rather than 3mm
but fundamentally the point is that the doors are not the only segment of the truck for which the stainless needs strength
in fact, setting aside the “bulletproof” point, it’s the doors that matter zero for structure - so the SS there could be thinned without effecting structural registry of the truck
Sponsored