BannedByTMC
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #31
I have to say the stock price is holding up better than I expected today.
Sponsored
100% agree on this point. The next 10 years are going to be interesting.That's the thing, Elon won't be able to stop or control AI in general.
I've read Barrat's "Our Final Invention" and agree with much of his premise, as well as Bostrom and others.100% agree on this point. The next 10 years are going to be interesting.
I work with ML (aka AI) all day long. It's not quite the problem the general public seems to think it is, in that, no computers are going to wake up one day and take over the world. It's a different kind of problem ... knowledge without morality - https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/ai-and-paperclip-problem
As I've said I don't think Elon needs more control over Tesla.But who else would you put in charge of Tesla or at least AI within Tesla? Knowing that it's 100% happening, who do you trust?
I get that, but you're just saying you don't like a thing without a better idea ... who inside Tesla do we know to be more trustworthy than Elon to overwatch AI (or Tesla for that matter)?As I've said I don't think Elon needs more control over Tesla.
At this point I think we need a more level headed CEO strictly devoted to Tesla and who won't threaten to take his toys and runaway like a child. The other Tesla engineers we've seen seem competent and less rash than Elon so one of them, or bring back JB.I get that, but you're just saying you don't like a thing without a better idea ... who inside Tesla do we know to be more trustworthy than Elon to overwatch AI (or Tesla for that matter)?
Estimates for results are seldom accurate when it comes to new technology. Were the Wright Brothers on schedule?Elon has consistently over estimated Tesla's AI technology for years as the slow progress of FSD has shown.
Did they make predictions about products they were selling to the public?Were the Wright Brothers on schedule?
What he claimed was factually correct. He had receipts and corroborating evidence that the court refused to even hear.He tried to get out of buying Twitter. He "claimed" it was the "bots" issue.
Honestly don't remember the details at this point but at the time I was not convinced by his conclusions and believe he misinterpreted Twitter's claims. There was ongoing debate as to how Twitter measured users and bots.What he claimed was factually correct. He had receipts and corroborating evidence that the court refused to even hear.
Are you not aware of this?
Since that was before the 5x and then 3x splits you'd get $28/share. I'll double the offer.Since it's a public company it's not "his", it's "ours", (if you're a shareholder). But if he want's to take it private for $420 I won't complain ?
Why? If this decision stands it gives Tesla billions (at least in the short term).I have to say the stock price is holding up better than I expected today.
Even if you don't directly work in this industry, anyone with a pulse can tell that Twitter outright lied about the number of bots on their platform.Honestly don't remember the details at this point but at the time I was not convinced by his conclusions and believe he misinterpreted Twitter's claims. There was ongoing debate as to how Twitter measured users and bots.
Since we are now post split...Since that was before the 5x and then 3x splits you'd get $28/share. I'll double the offer.
Market usually doesn't like uncertainty, especially around the CEO.Why? If this decision stands it gives Tesla billions (at least in the short term).
Musk didn't do his due diligence before signing a deal.Even if you don't directly work in this industry, anyone with a pulse can tell that Twitter outright lied about the number of bots on their platform.
Either way, the court refused to even hear the evidence. As I said above. Justice is dead.