- First Name
- Tony
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2024
- Threads
- 17
- Messages
- 235
- Reaction score
- 383
- Location
- Fort Lauderdale
- Vehicles
- CT AWD
- Banned
- #31
Sorry but regardless of the extensive dissertation, it’s still politics.It’s funny to me that you said politics. It’s politicians that convinced people that science is political. In reality, science that strives to be unbiased could never by definition be political in and of itself.
I don’t see my job as political. I help people. If helping people is now political, there is something wrong with politics. I have issues with deniers of truth regardless of their polotical leanings or lack thereof. As the old saying goes, we are all entitled to our own opinions, but not our own facts. Anyone that tries to turn actual unbiased scientific data into something political can only ever have a motivatjon to distract you from paying attention to facts that would endanger that individual’s politcal aspirations. I mean to state this conceptually rather than politically, by the way. We aren’t supposed to discuss politics on this forum, which I try to comply with. It is sad to me that in this day and age even discussing how pollution has clearly increased the incidence of respiratory ailments is “politics” rather than simply a statement of fact, or at least the strongest sort of observed correlation. I suppose one could argue that stating something about the oil industry is political, although I really don’t think so when clearly the oil industry is actually responsible for the majority of the pollution. We have data and figures on these things.
The way the public has been programmed to respond to scientific data at this point is appalling to me. If we don’t have a neutral starting point we can all agree on (facts/unbiased raw data) then there is no way to come to compromises or understand one another when we differ in opinion or interpretation. Science and math were meant to be the ultimate standard in that regard but from my opinionated perspective this has been methodically and intentionally undone to get the public to a point where they cannot use these things as an agreed-upon standard and medical facts are now just “politics.” I would think any serious physician with the best interest of their patients in mind would have to have a respect for science in order to assist the population properly. Pity that other professions apparently do not have the same requirement.
All those features you mentioned are icing on the cake for me. What I like best is sleeping well at night.
My two cents.
Cheers.
Sponsored