Are there superchargers that don’t “accept free supercharging”?

[hemiarch]

So funny. You must be confused or be thinking of someone else because again I'll state for the second time. That Tesla is not a very good corporate citizen if you ask me. My experience with them has been good at times and lackluster more often than not recently.

And the stuff that they do play the in the legal world is quite shady. Didn't they withhold evidence or Stonewall or slow walk information to a plaintiff on the death case down in Florida?

But let's get back to the point. These are privately owned superchargers with no Tesla logos on them. They are not part of the Tesla supercharging Network unless you decide you want to enable the search function for them.

And those that think that Tesla is going to stop making superchargers in force others to make them. All while slowly eliminate the free supercharging which is being phased out anyway and probably in 9 years probably won't be a factor to most people. One word delusional. And just fueling fire because you again just want to hear yourself speak.

Could you imagine all the people going in and out of tiny little grocery stores that only have four stalls put up?

What I think Tesla is trying to do is accommodate the business user. If you look at the business cases from Europe and China that Tesla talks about, you'll see that people go and use those businesses and get more foot traffic. Does it make sense to me from a business owner's perspective? Not really. It will be very expensive and I don't know if there is an roi on that one. I'm sure someone will say that Tesla is making so much money from this project that it's going to add not cents to their earnings but dollars. A fairy tale I would say.

I think some here think that this is going to be the next way it's expanded. I think we're going to see a very very small number of these going in.

That was pretty coherent and useful to progressing the conversation. I agree with most of it actually. It’s a valid perspective.
If you could just get rid of the “fueling the fire yada yada…hear yourself speak” parts , you would come across as an intelligent and contributory member of this community and not a sociopath.

Sponsored

 

[Outdoors]

That was pretty coherent and useful to progressing the conversation. I agree with most of it actually. It’s a valid perspective.
If you could just get rid of the “fueling the fire yada yada…hear yourself speak” parts , you would come across as an intelligent and contributory member of this community and not a sociopath.

Sorry, but I would define someone that is a sociopath as that cannot reason with basic common sense and if not understanding the difference between superchargers that are not labeled Tesla and ones that are. That fits in the DSM for you somewhere I am sure. Maybe not perfectly, but I'm sure there's at least two or three characteristics in there for you.

If there's a horse in the world, I'm sure you've beat it to death 10 times over with your thought processes on just about any argument that you may make in your life.



Well thanks for basically agreeing with me. But again, you seem not to be able to agree with anything that anybody makes a comment about except for your at CJ friend Dalton.

 

[hemiarch]

Sorry, but I would define someone that is a sociopath as that cannot reason with basic common sense and if not understanding the difference between superchargers that are not labeled Tesla and ones that are. That fits in the DSM for you somewhere I am sure. Maybe not perfectly, but I'm sure there's at least two or three characteristics in there for you.

If there's a horse in the world, I'm sure you've beat it to death 10 times over with your thought processes on just about any argument that you may make in your life.



Well thanks for basically agreeing with me. But again, you seem not to be able to agree with anything that anybody makes a comment about except for your at CJ friend Dalton.

Good thing it’s not you doing the defining in this world.

 

[CyberGus]

So this forum has a doctor and a lawyer, now all we need is a psychotherapist

And maybe a bartender?

 

[hemiarch]

So this forum has a doctor and a lawyer, now all we need is a psychotherapist

And maybe a bartender?

No rabbi though? Or priest?

 

[CyberGus]

No rabbi though? Or priest?

I need a young priest, and an old priest

 

[hemiarch]

I need a young priest, and an old priest

That’s totally what we need to add into this shitshow of a thread…ageism humor.
Have at it Gus…I’m gonna spectate for a while.

 

[CyberGus]

That’s totally what we need to add into this shitshow of a thread…ageism humor.

The old/young priest requirement is from The Exorcist. Before your time? (1973)

 

[hemiarch]

The old/young priest requirement is from The Exorcist. Before your time? (1973)

Ah..did not get that reference. Seen the movie it just didn’t register. Never mind. Let the shitshow resume unabated.

 

[Cyberfamily]

Maybe a female's perspective. I am here by they way. Just because I am a nurse doesn't mean I don't deal with all of your bull shit all day. Doctors and lawyers and everything in between.

 

[dalton108]

The old/young priest requirement is from The Exorcist. Before your time? (1973)

I prefer the way they addressed this in “This is the End!”

Sponsored