.

[Alpine]

.

Sponsored

 

[Wraven]

The information might be true but because Reuters has shown almost zero journalistic integrity towards Tesla, I’m highly dubious.

 

[Deleted member 17810]

The information might be true but because Reuters has shown almost zero journalistic integrity towards Tesla, I’m highly dubious.

It's a court filing, my dude.

 

[jerhenderson]

The thing is Tesla has a product that has shown progressive iterations that are more capable than the last, so no claim of deception can stand - its merely the complexity of what the goal was.

 

[Jhodgesatmb]

The information might be true but because Reuters has shown almost zero journalistic integrity towards Tesla, I’m highly dubious.

The moderator has cajones stipulating no politics when the post itself is pure politics :-(

 

[TwilightHan]

https://www.reuters.com/legal/tesla...-lawsuit-over-self-driving-claims-2024-05-15/

A California lawyer not reading the fine print. Golden!

if you read most of the lawsuits open for Tesla across the country, they all blame Elon and what he says through media instead of taking responsibility and reading the text when buying FSD and agreements.
it’s literally a joke at this point as lawyers are copying and pasting other law firms introduction word for word on why Mr Asperger Elon is bad and how everyone’s lives are poorer because of him.

The pregnant lady that decided to let her two year old run around inside her Model X, with the key in the car, and he put it in drive while she tried to physicall stop it by standing in front of it and getting crushed between the car and garage. What happened to that case that has been going on for almost 5 years? It recently got dismissed.

Legal system is a gambling system and there are lots of bad judges, so nothing is guaranteed. However it’s sad that no one can take responsibility for their purchasing decisions.

 

[Deleted member 17810]

Where? Not in the OP neither in the linked article.

The article is about the court filings of the lawsuit.

The case is In re Tesla Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 22-05240.

It's an ongoing lawsuit and this is an update of what's happening.

U.S. District Judge Rita Lin in San Francisco said owners could pursue negligence and fraud-based claims, to the extent they relied on Tesla's representations regarding vehicles' hardware and ability to drive coast-to-coast across the U.S.

Without ruling on the merits, Lin said that "if Tesla meant to convey that its hardware was sufficient to reach high or full automation, the plainly alleges sufficient falsity."

…


The judge dismissed some other claims.
Tesla and its lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Lawyers for Tesla vehicle owners did not immediately respond to similar requests.

The case was led by Thomas LoSavio, a retired California lawyer who said he paid an $8,000 premium in 2017 for Full Self-Driving capabilities on a Tesla Model S, believing it would make driving safer if his reflexes deteriorated as he aged.

This is the problem with people pulling out the boogey man of "the media" or whatever.

 

[Deleted member 17810]

LOL - still no court filing provided.

This is the problem with people still believing that legacy aka mainstream media aka fake news (especially reutrers) has any shred of credibility

You can literally go look up the case information, with the case number provided in the article.

?

 

[CyberGus]

Tesla did a bad job of marketing FSD. Charging a few thousand to enable basic ADAS features like TACC is actually in-line with industry pricing, but they also dangled "self-driving Real Soon Now" which led to angry customers when it didn't materialize.

Would I pay a few thousand for basic ADAS? Sure. Would I have paid extra for self-driving in 2015 with the promise that it might be finished in 10 years? lol no

If you paid for a "coming soon" feature that was still not delivered by the time the vehicle warranty expired, I think you deserve a refund, or at least transferability.

 

[hobbit11]

https://www.reuters.com/legal/tesla...-lawsuit-over-self-driving-claims-2024-05-15/

another corrupt, horribly lawless biden nomination...dei

 

[CyberGus]

another corrupt, horribly lawless biden nomination...dei

 

[jerhenderson]

Tesla did a bad job of marketing FSD. Charging a few thousand to enable basic ADAS features like TACC is actually in-line with industry pricing, but they also dangled "self-driving Real Soon Now" which led to angry customers when it didn't materialize.

Would I pay a few thousand for basic ADAS? Sure. Would I have paid extra for self-driving in 2015 with the promise that it might be finished in 10 years? lol no

If you paid for a "coming soon" feature that was still not delivered by the time the vehicle warranty expired, I think you deserve a refund, or at least transferability.

A bad job? I'm literate and understood the limitations. Maybe the illiterate couldn't make it.

Sponsored