stevenpoint1
Member
- First Name
- Steve
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2024
- Threads
- 1
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 3
- Location
- Canada
- Vehicles
- Tesla Model X Plaid, Model Y Performance
- Occupation
- Napping
Do the core covers fit them?
Sponsored
Those look really good on the CT. How do they compare to your original Tires? Range, Sound?Here you go
![]()
They are supposed to fit them Haven't gottem mine yet but have seen photos of the covers on them.Do the core covers fit them?
Slightly less range...has gotten cold here so that is amplifying the drop in efficiency but. More road noise then the original ones. Ride nice though.Those look really good on the CT. How do they compare to your original Tires? Range, Sound?
I've noticed the ride is harder over pavement imperfections and stones than the OEM AT's at every reasonable pressure. And that makes sense because they have a higher weight rating and an additional sidewall ply.Slightly less range...has gotten cold here so that is amplifying the drop in efficiency but. More road noise then the original ones. Ride nice though.
But the winter set has cyber wheels not core ones, so hence the question, do core covers fit the upgraded cyber wheels (the winter set comes with cyber)?They are supposed to fit them Haven't gottem mine yet but have seen photos of the covers on them.
Any more observations from your experience? Get mine on the 18th so just curious.I mostly agree with everything you wrote. With more experience on the Duratrac Tires I can say the OEM AT tires are better on all hard surfaces, wet or dry, with the exception of ice, wet leaves, and puddled water (which isn't really a hard surface). The OEMs are also surprisingly better on cold, wet roads, at least down to 38 degrees F.
The DuraTracs are mostly better on soft surfaces, with the exception of loose gravel and almost certainly deep dry sand where the OEM AT tires will outperform.
The efficiency hit has shown up with an obviousness that is impossible to not see. I didn't see it at first because I believe on my highway drive home from the install, the trip computer hadn't recalibrated for the smaller diameter (so it thought I was covering more ground per kWh than I actually was). At some point it must have recalibrated, and the miles/kWh dropped rather precipitously. It's too soon for me to accurately quantify it, a wild ass guess would be 10%.
Yes, hard cornering on pavement with the Duratracs sucks, the tread blocks are small and tall so they easily bend and release traction in a manner that is not entirely predictable. This causes directional control to suffer if you push them that hard.Any more observations from your experience? Get mine on the 18th so just curious.
Thank you! Noted on cornering, not too much concern during winter time I'm a bit mellower! I'm at 430kWh/Mile already (high speed freeway commute, dirtbike hauling) so > 400 is norm for me, now just higher 400's due to tires maybe offset + by slowing down in winter and - normal cold weather loss and - Light bar (at some point)!Yes, hard cornering on pavement with the Duratracs sucks, the tread blocks are small and tall so they easily bend and release traction in a manner that is not entirely predictable. This causes directional control to suffer if you push them that hard.
The efficiency hit is real. My truck has risen above 400 kWh/mile for the first time since I got it in April. Of course some of that is the colder weather.
My general advice is to only get them for seasonal use even though they are rated for year-round use. When they wear down I can only hope I can find some real winter tires I like. That said, these are good at slower speeds on steep terrain off road.