Sponsored

2nd PCS2 failure

mongo

Well-known member
Joined
May 27, 2024
Threads
5
Messages
4,531
Reaction score
5,512
Location
SE Michigan
Vehicles
Cyberbeast
Country flag
Also the PCS is apparently design to handle both DC and AC high power - which you would normally avoid as they complexity of AC or DC presents their own unique design challenges at PCS power levels.
It's a bidirectional DC-AC converter, no way to avoid it.

AC has an additional challenge in that the current flows in both directions. This can cause tremendous stress on components unless the circuit is design to protect against that.
The reported failures seem to be on the DC side MOSFETs, not the AC back to back pairs. The converter switching frequency is way higher than 60Hz, but likely uses ZVS/ ZCS internally.
Sponsored

 

HaulingAss

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 3, 2020
Threads
28
Messages
10,336
Reaction score
20,763
Location
Western Washington, USA
Vehicles
Cybertruck DM, 2010 F-150, 2018 Performance Model 3, 2024 Performance Model 3
Country flag
The widespread PCS failures in 2024 and 2025 Cybertrucks are attributed to thermal fatigue in the MOSFETs — and this was not a PCS-isolated problem. The drive inverter recall (NHTSA 24V-832) used similar faulty MOSFET components from the same production era. ļæ¼ So the root issue is that the MOSFET spec chosen for the original PCS wasn’t robust enough for the sustained thermal cycling demands of the CT’s 48V architecture under real-world charging loads.
AI gets a lot wrong. We don't know whether the spec chosen for the MOSFETs was wrong, or if the MOSFETs don't fully meet the spec. It's also possible there was a software issue, or other questionable components, that worked the MOSFETs harder than intended.

MOSFET manufacturing is interesting in that the manufacturer tries to make them all the same, but due to various factors, including impurity distributions in the silicon, no two are alike. Each one will have unique efficiency and the more efficient ones will run cooler. The manufacturer tests them and sorts them into batches before selling them. The ones that generate less heat are priced higher because they are more efficient. Because each batch will contain a range of specs, even those in the same batch will have different failure rates depending upon where they fall in the range of that batch.

It could be that the spec chosen for the MOSFETs was borderline, or that the MOSFET manufacturer was pushing the limit of how they graded them. In any case, due to these natural variations, some will fail and some will last the life of the vehicle.
 

Flynn

Active member
First Name
Kevin
Joined
May 23, 2026
Threads
0
Messages
26
Reaction score
16
Location
Fremont,CA
Vehicles
2026 Cybertruck, 2022 MY
Occupation
Operations/Metrics Lead
Country flag
I don’t disagree, but it often seems like people think others don’t already know this. (To be fair many don’t). I should have qualified my post that my ai had been drinking all day šŸ˜‚

AI gets a lot right too, and is at least a place to start. It sounds like mosfets manufacturing/grading are a lot like cpu/gpus.

I wonder if munroe or anyone else has or will get their hands on some of these for teardown/analysis. Does it really come down to component temp control? Are failures less common in cold climates?
 
 








Top