CyberPappy
Member
- Thread starter
- #1
I know the advertised difference is ~20 miles in favor of AWD but curious if that holds up when both are driven conservatively (ie same tires, chill mode, and otherwise similar conditions with the intent to maximize range).
Is the beast just inherently more inefficient with the added motor and a bit of added weight or is the range difference more of an assumption that the beast will be driven more aggressively?
Some have argued that the tri motor design is inherently more efficient than the dual motor but that does not seem to be the case on paper anyways.
Thanks in advance!
Is the beast just inherently more inefficient with the added motor and a bit of added weight or is the range difference more of an assumption that the beast will be driven more aggressively?
Some have argued that the tri motor design is inherently more efficient than the dual motor but that does not seem to be the case on paper anyways.
Thanks in advance!
Sponsored