I think @Crissa was not critiquing the video or 𝕏-post, but rather the article's word twisting and substitution about the 𝕏-post and video, which is now common MSM behavior to exaggerate or distort everything. She addressed the author of the article, not the 𝕏-post or video itself.Seriously? You can't take a joke. Even EM liked that one on X.
Admittedly, I didn't read the post and only watched the video...again.I think @Crissa was not critiquing the video or 𝕏-post, but rather the article's word twisting and substitution about the 𝕏-post and video, which is now common MSM behavior to exaggerate or distort everything. She addressed the author of the article, not the 𝕏-post or video itself.
But I think the video is freaking cool!
- ÆCIII
Yep. Exactly two arms for each one.
You do understand this isn't relevant to the topic, or an answer, right?Yep. Exactly two arms for each one.
Doesn't need to be bullet proof, just need to make more than you enemy, and get them to reassemble the piece as they go. Easy squeezy. Someone should pay me movie idea royalties!
Of course it is. It's also funny...well at least I think it is. But maybe that's just my dad jokes.
Blocking me doesn't make your arguments more valid, or entertaining, it just cuts out a potential feedback loop. That's up to you.There's a reason I have JBee blocked usually.
Saying you can do a thing it literally not saying you plan to do the thing.
"Oh yes, I could run this conversation into the ground." -JBee, probably.
"So you planned to run this conversation into the ground?" - me, definitely.
-Crissa
