Mule Ferguson
Well-known member
- First Name
- Mule
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2020
- Threads
- 37
- Messages
- 262
- Reaction score
- 220
- Location
- North Wilkesboro, NC
- Vehicles
- Model X, Model P3D+, F150. Cybertruck Tri Motor
- Occupation
- House Husband
Yeah but now they have to figure out how to deliver the highest range on the least efficient version (heaviest) first. I’m skeptical and think he’s gonna have to pull a rabbit out of a hat. But it’s the thing I look forward to most. Saving pennies.I picked the Tri-motor after they moved up production by a year. As for range It won’t hurt to have a little extra. As to cost, I have ”sunk” cost in a solar PV array. I will be producing enough energy to provide local travel.
What about the energy required to plow through air between accelerating and stopping? I rode a bike 100 miles one day and I assure you that accelerating to cruising speed was the easy part. And I was on a very nice road bike--the CyberTruck is the equivalent of a mountain bike--it would have killed me to ride that 100 miles on a mountain bike.They know how to do that and it's really a pretty simple concept. How do you get more range in an ICE truck, especially one that is heavier? Put in a bigger gas tank. And that's what Tesla is doing. The biggest energy sink in a motor vehicle is the kinetic energy of the vehicle as it is accelerated and which energy is subsequently lost when the vehicle is braked. One of the big advantages of EVs is that much of this energy can be recaptured. But not all of it. Thus the heaviest vehicle is less efficient than the lighter ones but not so much so as would be the case were regen not available. This means that by doubling (I don't, of course, know what the actual battery size increase factor will be) the battery you can easily compensate for the extra mass of the heavier truck (no small part of which is attributable to the battery) and add 200 miles range. I don't think we need to worry too much about the 500 mile range spec.
That's why he said not 100% recovery. Lots of other losses, too.What about the energy required to plow through air between accelerating and stopping?
They easily could, but batteries are the expensive part. They can't get the range at the price point they require, so they cheap out.If getting 500+ were as easy as adding a bigger gas tank electric cars would be getting 500 miles to a charge now.
Bearing friction, ohmic losses, wheel slip, energy lost in recovery, drag etc all sum to give the total consumption. The physics are the same for a heavy truck as for a light truck though the numbers will be different. Tesla has enough experience by now to know how to measure and/or estimate these losses quite accurately. Given this it should be quite clear that they can estimate the total consumption of a heavy vehicle just as well as they can for a lighter one. If the heavier vehicle's consumption is 125% of the lighter one's then to have the same range as the lighter one it is only necessary that the battery be 25% larger.