Gigahorse
Well-known member
- Thread starter
- #91
I thought the Rivian also was given a little bit of an edge in the test, the only exception to that is when Zach slowed down with the CT in order to make sure he made it to the next charger. Hard to quantify if the 5 degrees, 5mph difference on the top end, or slowing to the 40s near the end had the greatest impact. I think they were fairly close and pretty good comparisons given the same towing load etc.I went back and watched the Rivian towing run. I interpreted the two drives more favorable to the Cybertruck.
Zach drove the Rivian 69 miles with a 10,300 lb trailer load. The trailer weighed 9300 lbs for the first 9 miles until he added 1000 lbs of steel plate to the trailer. After driving 78 miles he reduced the weight of the trailer back to 9300 lbs before continuing on barely making it to a Camping Word where all the charging stations were being ICEd. At 78 miles he ESTIMATED that it would go another 30 miles based on the truck's range instrumentation which was acting very strangely throughout the drive. At the end of the video he backed off and claimed the Rivian would go 100 miles towing 10,000 lbs. Again, an estimate.
In my opinion, the Cybertruck did better than the Rivian. The Cybertruck started out the trip at 32 deg F, while for the Rivian it was 37 deg F. The CT display showed that Zach was often driving near 70 mph until nearing the end, not keeping it a 65 as he said he was for the Rivian. CT went a full 90 miles with a 10,400 lb trailer using 108 kWh from its 123 kWh battery. He made a big production of range anxiety, but in reality was in no danger of running out of charge. The CT could have traveled another 12 miles for a total distance of 102 miles to empty. The Cybertruck averaged 0.83 mi/kWh. Zach never gave an efficiency value for the Rivian for comparison purposes, but knowing that the Rivian has a 135 kWh battery vs 123 kWh for CT, the Cybertruck is clearly more efficient.
He also claimed the 0 to 60 time of 12 seconds was the same for both. That's true, but the Rivian was a quad motor while the CT was a dual motor. The CT Tri-motor would have out performed the Rivian.
It's pretty clear that Zach is biased in favor of the Rivian, he even said so at the end of the video. Liking one truck over another is fine, but making apples-to-oranges comparisons to show that your favorite is better is a bit dishonest.
Sponsored