Sponsored

Urander

Well-known member
Site Sponsor
Joined
Dec 26, 2023
Threads
77
Messages
1,706
Reaction score
2,191
Location
CA
Website
urander.com
Vehicles
Cyberbeast
Country flag
V4 Supercharger 14% to 56% Test - 15 minutes!(10:45 - 11:00)
V4 Supercharger 14% to 80% Test - 33 minutes! (10:45 - 11:18) Down at least 12 minutes, from 45 minutes on V3 chargers.





Tesla Cybertruck V4 Supercharger 14% to 56% Test - 15 minutes! IMG_5412
Tesla Cybertruck V4 Supercharger 14% to 56% Test - 15 minutes! IMG_5433
Tesla Cybertruck V4 Supercharger 14% to 56% Test - 15 minutes! IMG_5444
Tesla Cybertruck V4 Supercharger 14% to 56% Test - 15 minutes! IMG_5452
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

CTOmaha

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 24, 2024
Threads
21
Messages
235
Reaction score
429
Location
Nebraska
Vehicles
CT FS AWD, MY 24
Country flag
Is there a way to know which charger is v4 from your Tesla app when using the route planner?
 

mjezzi

Well-known member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Nov 21, 2024
Threads
6
Messages
155
Reaction score
152
Location
Boulder, CO
Vehicles
model 3, model y, cybertruck
Country flag
I know there was talk that v3 superchargers will be able to support 350kW. If that can turn that on next, that would be amazing since there are already so many v3 chargers out there.
 

SONNYDUT

Well-known member
First Name
Sonny
Joined
Dec 16, 2019
Threads
8
Messages
282
Reaction score
654
Location
Westminster, Ca
Vehicles
Dual-Motor Cybertruck, Model S, Model Y, Model 3
Occupation
Engineering 3D Print Specailist
Country flag
It nice to know I could charge fast for long trip, but I sure don't want to charge like this every times since I use supercharging frequently. I prefer the slowest one (72kWh Supercharger), for the long life of my battery. I am planning to keep my CT long as I live.
 


mongo

Well-known member
Joined
May 27, 2024
Threads
6
Messages
4,646
Reaction score
5,652
Location
SE Michigan
Vehicles
Cyberbeast
Country flag
I know there was talk that v3 superchargers will be able to support 350kW. If that can turn that on next, that would be amazing since there are already so many v3 chargers out there.
V4 Superchargers are the new posts with V3 cabinets. The cabinets can do 325+kW, but Im pretty sure V2/V3 posts lack the current and voltage ratings to go much above 250kW.
 

mjezzi

Well-known member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Nov 21, 2024
Threads
6
Messages
155
Reaction score
152
Location
Boulder, CO
Vehicles
model 3, model y, cybertruck
Country flag
It nice to know I could charge fast for long trip, but I sure don't want to charge like this every times since I use supercharging frequently. I prefer the slowest one (72kWh Supercharger), for the long life of my battery. I am planning to keep my CT long as I live.
It's not true that fast charging is bad for your battery. The battery management system does a very good job of making sure fast charging doesn't cause degradation. Jeff Dahn, who knows the batteries better than anyone stated this. Degradation is main due to characteristics of the battery and for the panasonic batteries there is a tiny bit of degradation every time you charge past ~75%, regardless if your slow charging or fast charging.. We don't know if the 4680 batteries have this some characteristic or not. Regardless, fast charging does not cause degradation.
 

mjezzi

Well-known member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Nov 21, 2024
Threads
6
Messages
155
Reaction score
152
Location
Boulder, CO
Vehicles
model 3, model y, cybertruck
Country flag
V4 Superchargers are the new posts with V3 cabinets. The cabinets can do 325+kW, but Im pretty sure V2/V3 posts lack the current and voltage ratings to go much above 250kW.
hmm, so in theory could the just replace the v3 posts with v4 posts?
 


cardad

Well-known member
First Name
Kelvin
Joined
Feb 14, 2024
Threads
3
Messages
219
Reaction score
207
Location
Moab
Vehicles
R1S, R1T, Bronco Raptor
Country flag
In relative terms this isn’t really that fast. There seems to be some thermal limit they’re hitting either in the pack or the charging unit.

I can usually get around 80 kWh in 30 min in the charge curve sweet spot with 400 V charging a Rivian so these V4 numbers are not even close to what 800 V is capable of. If they can avg 200 kWh from 10-80 that’s about 25 min for ~84 kWh and we’re not seeing those numbers.
 

henchman24

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 19, 2023
Threads
0
Messages
370
Reaction score
614
Location
Wyoming
Vehicles
Dual Motor Cybertruck
Country flag
In relative terms this isn’t really that fast. There seems to be some thermal limit they’re hitting either in the pack or the charging unit.

I can usually get around 80 kWh in 30 min in the charge curve sweet spot with 400 V charging a Rivian so these V4 numbers are not even close to what 800 V is capable of. If they can avg 200 kWh from 10-80 that’s about 25 min for ~84 kWh and we’re not seeing those numbers.
Sounds like OOS will be releasing a video soon, but early data suggests this is about 5-6 minutes faster than the gen 1 large pack, and an additional minute or two faster than the gen 2 pack.

Depends on what you mean by thermals though. To get 325kW they are hitting 875 amps and that seems like the practical limit of some piece of equipment in the system. Could be V3 cabinets/bus bars, could be V4 cables (though that seems unlikely), could be port to battery cabling... the cell temps so far don't suggest they are overheating, but could be any of the prior pieces.
 
 








Top