bg002h
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2024
- Threads
- 9
- Messages
- 413
- Reaction score
- 290
- Location
- Arizona
- Vehicles
- Cyberbeast
- Occupation
- Radiologist
Fully autonomous is the key word here. It will be interesting to see what new legal standards emerge from trying to implement laws written for this situation. I guarantee you prosecutors will argue that software alone can’t convert an operable vehicle into an inoperable one and defendants will argue at the precise moment of the violation they were electing to have the software drive the vehicle, not themselves…some standard for proof will eventually have to emerge and it will have to be clear and unambiguous (like absence of a steering wheel or software that doesn’t permit disengaging autonomous mode without leaving visible/collectable evidence of disengagement, for example).
At the end of the day, you don’t want to be the one paying a lawyer as they fight in court (potentially over your freedom) to set the standards for how the laws are interpreted, so don’t fuck up in your self driving car! Most people don’t understand law creation vs. law interpretation and how clean the former can seem and how messy the latter truly is.
At the end of the day, you don’t want to be the one paying a lawyer as they fight in court (potentially over your freedom) to set the standards for how the laws are interpreted, so don’t fuck up in your self driving car! Most people don’t understand law creation vs. law interpretation and how clean the former can seem and how messy the latter truly is.
Sponsored
