Woodman506
New member
- First Name
- Kris
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2019
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 3
- Reaction score
- 1
- Location
- New Brunswick
- Vehicles
- Model 3
- Occupation
- CNC Programmer/Instructor
hopefully like a Spinal Tap amp. !!
Sponsored
Sure thing. I’ll contrast my all-in across ownership mi/kWh results (95% around town driving, where I pay zero attention to efficiency and drive like a stole it) vs a long distance trip (where I drove very attentive to efficiency)CV,
How many miles do you typically get out of your 320mi pack?
Thank you for the thorough response, as always. It definitely gave me an in-depth glimpse of what it feels day-to-day driving an EV with a battery vs gas mindset.Sure thing. I’ll contrast my all-in across ownership mi/kWh results (95% around town driving, where I pay zero attention to efficiency and drive like a stole it) vs a long distance trip (where I drove very attentive to efficiency)
Here’s my all-in stats across total ownership, which is 95% around town daily driving plus regularly using my truck as an office of hours on end. For my day-to-day use, I rarely pre-condition, live in central Texas, use HVAC with abandon, leave pro-power turned on always (this prob dumb), take every opportunity to floor it, and - importantly, regularly leave my truck (and HVAC) running for extended periods of time.
To get a sense for how much I leave my truck running with HVAC etc on, note that my average speed (9,280mi/680hrs) is 13mph
And with all that zero-thought driving plus truck-office use, truck’s come in at 2mi/kWh
To which the haters say “2mi/kWh in a 131kwh pack?! That’s 260mi, not 320!”
Very true!
But here are the contents of two posts from another forum, not long after receiving the truck, of my two first ever BEV long-distance trips, wherein I was attentive to my conditioning, driving style, etc., at hWy conditions:
THE OUTBOUND:
“Snug in the beach house, with a comfortable (if conservative) passage through the charging desert!• Began trip with 100% charge from Austin at 10:53AM, 91° ambient with climate set to 75°; GoM estimated 294mi range (based on my previously all around-town driving)• Drove 78.5 miles with a dash-purported 2.7mi/kWh, arriving at San Antonio EA fast charger with 80% battery • Charged to 100% in 57mins (the first 20 had the truck/climate running while we ate), with 28.613kWh eaten by the truck (corroborating the 2.7mi/kWh dashboard figure), GoM now Estimating 305mi range; emboldened, set cruise to ~70mph and cabin climate to 72°• Drove 178 miles (including through a windy thunder storm) with a dash-purported 2.1mi/kWh, arriving at Port A beach house with with GoM estimated 94mi of range remaining• In all, 256mi at a dash-purported combined average of 2.3mi/kWh [through a storm, and with less efficiency care on the back 2/3rds of the trip]”
THE RETURN:
“the battery began at 100%, and the GoM began at 280mi [anticipating my typical driving style]. Around 90° outdoors, internal climate set to 75°, with the return trip only ~+500’ net gain in elevation and little to no forecasted wind.I pegged BlueCruise to 64mph the entire trip…After 3 hours of driving (plus 30 total minutes of idling bathroom stops) between Port Aransas and San Antonio via Hwy37 (big multi-lane):Covered 179mi (avg. 60mph in drive time
- GoM down -150mi to 130mi of remaining range
- @ a dash-purported 2.4kWh (94% to driving, 3% to climate, 3% to accessories)
At hour 3.5, charged from 70 to 93% (in 52min - there was a charge fault while we were elsewhere, eating), with 66.7kWh delivered to the truck (per EA charger)The last 1.5 hours of the drive (between San Antonio and Austin, Hwy35, more stop-and-go included):
- Covered 78mi (avg. 52mph) @ 2.8mi/kWh
- Arrived home with 73% charge, and GoM at 215mi”
Moral of the combined story of my all-in driving mi/kWh vs hWy trips taking the basics of observing efficiency:
• giving my daily driving (and truck-officing) style, the Lightning’s lifetime average of 2.0mi/kWh is pretty damn good - given that 2.44mi/kWh is the target for 320mi out of a 131kWh usable pack
• that conclusion is further evidenced by, when giving any care to efficiency (eg on long distance drives), I can cruise-control at 70 or 65mph (and real world average at 65-60ish door to door), and get as good or in excess of 2.44kWh
To which someone might say “I can’t fathom driving any slower than 80mph on a highway trip.” To which I would respond: then you never bought a 320mi truck in the first place, but that’s kind of on you.
On highways, I drive for comfort, safety, and efficiency.
Around town, I fill up nightly, I drive like I’m never going to worry about range - because I don’t.
Exactly!Since it's mkbhd. If beast mode exists, that's the one he's testing.
Performance models always have less range.
Model y has 330 miles of range but MYP has 303
So it might be a bit better if you're shooting for normal dual
It'd be funny AF if both Tesla and MKBHD are trolling us with the way they did the photo. Maybe the actual range would be 350+ miles. Can't wait to see if we were trolled or if this is real.
At this point, white trim does not confirm tri motor. All the showroom units are dual motor with white trim.
That's a hope because I dont think my MYP changes the mileage gauge going from chill to sport. The picture also does not show the wheels. Very carefully cropped to show range without the wheels showing on the screen. If this is a tri motor with premium wheels, a dual motor on road tires will be around 317 miles.
on one hand, it is definitely a different mindsetThank you for the thorough response, as always. It definitely gave me an in-depth glimpse of what it feels day-to-day driving an EV with a battery vs gas mindset.
That's what I've been thinking also. A reverse of the Lightning video where the true CT range is actually much higher than extrapolated.It'd be funny AF if both Tesla and MKBHD are trolling us with the way they did the photo. Maybe the actual range would be 350+ miles. Can't wait to see if we were trolled or if this is real.