DumpsterFire
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2023
- Threads
- 12
- Messages
- 744
- Reaction score
- 2,145
- Location
- Utah
- Vehicles
- Model 3
- Occupation
- Mouth Breather
Fair enough! Haha
Sponsored
Even if it's not "more", it's probably a very high percentage of what a fresh install costs. I imagine upgrading a 150kW to 250kW costs 80-90% of what installing a fresh one costs. Even if they have to rip out all of the equipment including the copper, they probably spent some money making the mounts for the chargers and the big transformer boxes.Upgrading a Supercharger will probably cost more than installing a new one. And since new ones are more desirable, that's what Tesla does, they just add new ones.
250kW stations are a LOT different from 150kW stations. As a simple visible difference, the cables to the cars are SMALLER for the higher current connections. That's because they are liquid cooled. Yea, they have pumps to pump the liquid around.
The 72 kW mall charging station. They make a lot of sense, they just didn't see much adoption. Probably because Simon wanted too much to install them.Near me, there's a 72kW station, and then maybe 3 or 4 miles away they put a 250kW station, rather than upgrade the existing one.
It wasn't nice until the 250kW was installed just up the road. But this was a really early station. 2012, maybe earlier. Only 5 stations. And, I don't at all fault them for doing it the way they did, it makes perfect sense. Why upgrade this 5 station charger that is often crowded when they can put an additional 10 station charger just up the road. More stations is always better than less stations.The 72 kW mall charging station. They make a lot of sense, they just didn't see much adoption. Probably because Simon wanted too much to install them.
For those that don't realize the nice part of the 72kW charger, the great part is that the charged slower. ??? Why is this nice? Because you don't have to stop shopping to go out and unplug your vehicle when full. And they are often installed in large numbers.
I hope Tesla starts installing pull through chargers by default for all new installations. It’ll help CT adoption significantly.It wasn't nice until the 250kW was installed just up the road. But this was a really early station. 2012, maybe earlier. Only 5 stations. And, I don't at all fault them for doing it the way they did, it makes perfect sense. Why upgrade this 5 station charger that is often crowded when they can put an additional 10 station charger just up the road. More stations is always better than less stations.
So the straw-man argument about 3500HD dually was intentional. Ok.
But that still doesn't explain why the cybertruck is lower duty than current year Silverado 1500/f150/Sierra/RAM 1500. Or why the cyberbeast tows 20% less than an f150 (which was specifically promised).
I didn't expect it to compete in the 250s, but I expected it to outperform the 150s. It doesn't, and its twice the price of an f150.
My guess? JalopnikWhat media is he/she/they from? Any guesses?
Pull-through locations are often dictated by the geography and property owner.I hope Tesla starts installing pull through chargers by default for all new installations. It’ll help CT adoption significantly.
I don’t know whether they have an option to install super chargers at rest area pull throughs. They have to cut a deal with city council and run the wires. The space and infrastructure is already there. It’ll be so amazing to have all major rest areas have Tesla V4 superchargers. It might help Semis as well.
I hope the future involves more pull through chargers also. My concern is with Tesla expanding the use of superchargers to other manufacturers, will there be a line of Lightnings and Rivian’s pulling trailers lining up also? Not to mention non-trailered vehicles parking and charging because they’re the only stalls available. Hopefully that’s not the case but I wouldn’t be surprised.I hope Tesla starts installing pull through chargers by default for all new installations. It’ll help CT adoption significantly.
I don’t know whether they have an option to install super chargers at rest area pull throughs. They have to cut a deal with city council and run the wires. The space and infrastructure is already there. It’ll be so amazing to have all major rest areas have Tesla V4 superchargers. It might help Semis as well.
Mainly to accelerate the availability of pull through chargers. Land next to interstates are premium properties. Acquiring them, getting permits, etc. is a long haul process, even if you are willing to pay lot of money. Rest areas seem to be a great option as the infrastructure already exists. I’m not saying just install super chargers only in rest areas. It’s good to start with them to have more pull through chargers.Not sure why you think rest areas are that great.
Let's add all the other EVs to the list. The total number really didn't change when I did this.I hope the future involves more pull through chargers also. My concern is with Tesla expanding the use of superchargers to other manufacturers, will there be a line of Lightnings and Rivian’s pulling trailers lining up also? Not to mention non-trailered vehicles parking and charging because they’re the only stalls available. Hopefully that’s not the case but I wouldn’t be surprised.