Woodrick
Well-known member
- First Name
- Ed
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2023
- Threads
- 6
- Messages
- 4,786
- Reaction score
- 4,762
- Location
- Gainesville Ga
- Vehicles
- Model 3, Model Y, Cybertruck AWD
- Occupation
- Consultant
That may be your goal, but that's not the point that you've been bringing up.I'm not asking for more and more outlandish "solutions" on how to approach this- I'm showing that there is a market for a 500+ mile cybertruck, and the lengths you go to deny this is astounding.
I like the cybertruck, it has a lot of good aspects which I've been very vocal about. You trying to limit this forum to people who can only praise it is disturbing and unhelpful. Please just let people discuss Cybertruck stuff in reality here and stick to X threads with $TSLA pumpers if that's what you want.
So, let's start at point 1. Tesla did indicate that that they weren't able to reach 500 Blended EPA miles (although they are still trying). So no need to keep beating that dead horse.
2) In no circumstances should a 500-mile EPA blended number ever be considered the 75-mph range. That's trying to make an apple an orange.
3) EVs are just the opposite from ICE in range above the EPA Blended number. An EV gets less , while an ICE often gets more (to a point, and then both go downhill) This is because that an ICE has gears to optimize the sweet spot in the motor to a specific speed.
4) ICE mileage suffer below 60 mph. The biggest issue with this is that blow 60 mph is where the majority of driving is. I believe it's around 70% of the driving.
5) 300 miles seems to be the current sweet spot for EVs.
6) In a 250 mile Tesla, you can travel across the country with ease
7) When charging at home, who cares about the range, it's the WH/mi that's important.
And again, a 500 mile EPA blended range NEVER meant that the truck could go that far at 75 mph.
Sponsored