No need to make fun… newbies like myself appreciate the content and people on this forum vs others. I feel more welcomed and less belittled than others.. let’s keep it that wayOP joined today, just to post this!
Easy guys. Making fun of a new poster that had a legitimate ask (even if I disagree and would argue against it) puts y’all in a worse light than him.. and i know y’all are good/valuable members/posters of the CT community
I don't want Tesla to be a boutique car manufacturer. Tesla's idea of only having a few models with a few easy options is what they need to continue to do to expand the use of EVs.
Is that a problem? By commenting this you’re just starting unneeded controversy. I don’t know if that’s your point or not. And yes, I did join today not JUST to post this, but more so to post other threads in the near future
Gordo!!!
Honestly I don't know what are you talking about!It’s not necessarily a bad thing, as the new cybertruck sightings seem to pertain more towards functionality, rather than looks. The prototype, and current cybertrucks in the museum/showrooms look ASTRONOMICALLY better than the camo-wrapped, or other public sightings we’ve seen. It looks much sharper, intimidating, badass, and a much better designed model. However the ones in the public sightings look very rushed, and as though it was genuinely taped together last minute.
in the following clips, you can clearly tell which ones are better designed, and looks better. The taillights on the sighting cybertruck look very tacky, cheap, and rushed. However on my other video I also posted, it looks much cleaner, expensive, and just what the cybertruck will need.
The taillights and light bar aren’t the only thing wrong. It looks much “duller” and something that someone has made in their garage. I’m sorry.
PS-
If you think I’m simply a Tesla-hater, think again. I own 427 TSLA stock dividends, 2 Model 3 RWDs, 1 Model Y LR, and a Model X. I also have 2 tri-motor cybertrucks reserved since the hour it was released. I love Tesla and will continue to support them, but I can’t see how the cybertruck will be successful (based on their recent sightings).
and "astronomically" is not granted eather unless you are looking on tiny details under microscope on 5o inch monitor. It is the same CT like in 2019, same shape, same SS, maaaaybe little smaller but we don't know for sure and probably good thing far actually fitting this thing in garage.. Now it's like "yeah, I got it, it's awesome, just take my money.. blah, blah, blah"
I wasThere's something to talk about regarding the differences in the OG prototype and the pre-production models.
The thing is... they're prototypes. Fit and finish isn't what they're working on here. And the tail lights may just be placeholders to get them on the street. Each one of these is hand-built, then messed around with, things taken on and off... no one's kit car works perfectly every time out of the box, does it?
And we can't really know proportions because these are just spy shots from afar.
So while I think the worries are valid... and I welcome the new poster! I think they have nothing to worry about. None of these were made in Austin, even.
?
-Crissa
I gladly will still purchase the cybertruck because I think it’s the coolest and most unique car made in a while. Maybe I’m simply reaching hard, and just staring at minor details. I’ve only seen the cybertruck at the Petersen automotive museum, and it looks incredible. I then saw videos of the prototypes being driven on the street, and they look nothing like it (in terms of body work, size, proportions, etc). Now that you’ve stated about it being a hand-built “kit car” I guess you’re rightHonestly I don't know what are you talking about!
The only way "astronomically" applies is the difference of seeing it first time back in Nov. 2019 and now, 4 years later after checking this site multiple times a day for last two years
So it is just emotional exhaustion
Sorry. You join a forum and make your 1st post and you say dramatic things that feel troll like you
The difference are the tires and rims, they're more aggressive on the prototype.It’s not necessarily a bad thing, as the new cybertruck sightings seem to pertain more towards functionality, rather than looks. The prototype, and current cybertrucks in the museum/showrooms look ASTRONOMICALLY better than the camo-wrapped, or other public sightings we’ve seen. It looks much sharper, intimidating, badass, and a much better designed model. However the ones in the public sightings look very rushed, and as though it was genuinely taped together last minute.
in the following clips, you can clearly tell which ones are better designed, and looks better. The taillights on the sighting cybertruck look very tacky, cheap, and rushed. However on my other video I also posted, it looks much cleaner, expensive, and just what the cybertruck will need.
The taillights and light bar aren’t the only thing wrong. It looks much “duller” and something that someone has made in their garage. I’m sorry.
PS-
If you think I’m simply a Tesla-hater, think again. I own 427 TSLA stock dividends, 2 Model 3 RWDs, 1 Model Y LR, and a Model X. I also have 2 tri-motor cybertrucks reserved since the hour it was released. I love Tesla and will continue to support them, but I can’t see how the cybertruck will be successful (based on their recent sightings).
Sure but the OP wasn’t trying to be an a** hole about his post, read his later post… and if you can criticize his post, I can do the same to yours and say it came across like a forum tough guy….(sorry, you reply on the forum and act like a holier than thou forum guru, you get feedback from the group)
I have to wonder if the prototype's aggressive tires are street legal enough to pass the various government regulations. If not, a less aggressive tire pattern would be needed to sell the CT as being street-legal.
