cvalue13
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2022
- Threads
- 74
- Messages
- 7,153
- Reaction score
- 13,769
- Location
- Austin, TX
- Vehicles
- F150L
- Occupation
- Fun-employed
- Thread starter
- #16
That said, and I’m deep in my armchair here, I think that the types of laminated glass required of windshields are more similar to the sort of laminated glass used for armored glass. This is why a broken windshield sticks together when smashed. Armored glass may be just like this but with thicker or multiple layers of glass/lamination.
Contrast with side windows, that are typically tempered glass (which is why unlike windshields, side glass beak into a billion square shards when smashed).
From my armchair, then, I could see safety regulations cutting either way with respect to windshields: the “armoring” qualities causing it to be either further in or further out of bounds.
In any event, these differences in construction are why windshields are more expensive than side glass (on an area basis), and why armored glass is more expensive than windshields.
I suppose it’s possible that if Tesla was cutting costs anywhere, having armored side glass would be one item on the bubble
Contrast with side windows, that are typically tempered glass (which is why unlike windshields, side glass beak into a billion square shards when smashed).
From my armchair, then, I could see safety regulations cutting either way with respect to windshields: the “armoring” qualities causing it to be either further in or further out of bounds.
In any event, these differences in construction are why windshields are more expensive than side glass (on an area basis), and why armored glass is more expensive than windshields.
I suppose it’s possible that if Tesla was cutting costs anywhere, having armored side glass would be one item on the bubble
Sponsored