Crissa, I'm willing to wager that these #s aren't accurate.We still don't know how comparable or accurate the numbers are...
-Crissa
You don't trust TFL?Crissa, I'm willing to wager that these #s aren't accurate.
How many times have we seen folks saying they have "insider" knowledge only to be proven wrong?
Ever hear the expression "trust, but verify"?You don't trust TFL?
I do trust, but I verify. Where is the verification? Did Tesla spell out the specs yet?You don't trust TFL?
Requiring verification is not trust. So you don't trust TFL. That's all you have to say.I do trust, but I verify. Where is the verification? Did Tesla spell out the specs yet?
There is way too much speculation right now. Everything you read or hear, including what I say, is speculation.
If you must verify before trusting that's not trust. It's a misnomer.Ever hear the expression "trust, but verify"?
That's what I do. Except for the "trust" part.
Let's just put it this way: trust or no trust, I wouldn't be surprised if their information is incomplete.Requiring verification is not trust. So you don't trust TFL. That's all you have to say.
Incomplete likely. Illegitimate likely not.Let's just put it this way: trust or no trust, I wouldn't be surprised if their information is incomplete.
It's not like TFL spoke to Tesla directly to come up with the specs. Someone gave it to them, claiming that they knew what the specs were and had "insider" knowledge.
Let me ask you this: how many times were these insiders incorrect?![]()
Well said.Incomplete likely. Illegitimate likely not.
PossibilityWell said.
Moreover, maybe this info was "old" info and the specs are different?
Too many unknowns here.
specs provided are correct, though a few nominally rounded to a tenth here and there. and of course they're 'incomplete,' because it's not a list of all specs.Well said.
Moreover, maybe this info was "old" info and the specs are different?
Too many unknowns here.