Sure. So then maybe you draw a line at a certain wage, or maybe salary vs hourly. But what about the new hire who makes $70k a year? Well surely you’re not going to make them forfeit over half of their salary back to their employer just for the privilege of parking at work. So you bump the line up to $100k. Well, at that point at least half of your work force is already excluded, and your mandate is worthless because the parking lot is still full of ICE. Seems dystopian to me.
The more authoritarian — legacy auto-like — you make a company the less likely you get good employees. Drive away the good ones, pun intended.
Its a joke man, lighten up.
I took no offense. I really did want to see what your answer would be.
In that case, no. I do not think they are literally the same. But I do think forcing employees or union members to do certain things is an over reach of power. That I do not support.
My take on unions after having belonged to a couple and seeing how they work is they aren't that much different than the USSR.
Yeah. just say that didn't happen, because it didn't.
She said "compete on equal footing" "so that we all end up at the same place."
That would be Kamala Harris and others in D.C., the lawmakers, ruling class.
