Tesla is dropping the hammer on employee leakers

[flowerlandfilms]

As long as Tesla has documented official employee rules of conduct, they have every right to restrict the use of cameras of any type while on Tesla property. This is normal is virtually every company. Employees don't have the "right" to do things within the boundaries of a company they work for when there are rules that limit what they can do. It's the same as smoking, drinking alcohol and taking drugs while on company property. If you're not willing to follow the rules, be prepared to be fired. I'm getting tired of all the leaks anyway because the majority give false information (prototypes, not final versions). It would be nice if people started to abide by rules instead of flaunting them.

Fuck the rules.

Abraham Lincoln, 1869

Sponsored

 

[prl99]

**** the rules.

Abraham Lincoln, 1869

Democracy is a work in progress. We've never had a king or queen after we got rid of the one in England (sorry, you still have to deal with that form of "government"). Former President Lincoln had to deal with the Constitution as it was written and believed in some of the more atrocious things our founding fathers believed in (slavery and the degradation of women). Quoting Lincoln or especially the founding fathers (I wonder how many "extra" children they had) is not always the best things to do because we've changed and for the most part we've gotten better with how we at least attempt to act as a nation. The USA is not perfect, no country is perfect, mainly because people don't think about things the same way. As for your comment, I perceive my original comment about Tesla rules to not be something you agree with. I presume if you break Australian law (assuming your stated location is correct) you will be held accountable and when found guilty you will serve time. Using your statement in front of an Australian judge would not go well. Tesla has it's rules (laws) and they should be abided by. If you don't like those rules, don't work for Tesla.

 

[flowerlandfilms]

Democracy is a work in progress. We've never had a king or queen after we got rid of the one in England (sorry, you still have to deal with that form of "government"). Former President Lincoln had to deal with the Constitution as it was written and believed in some of the more atrocious things our founding fathers believed in (slavery and the degradation of women). Quoting Lincoln or especially the founding fathers (I wonder how many "extra" children they had) is not always the best things to do because we've changed and for the most part we've gotten better with how we at least attempt to act as a nation. The USA is not perfect, no country is perfect, mainly because people don't think about things the same way. As for your comment, I perceive my original comment about Tesla rules to not be something you agree with. I presume if you break Australian law (assuming your stated location is correct) you will be held accountable and when found guilty you will serve time. Using your statement in front of an Australian judge would not go well. Tesla has it's rules (laws) and they should be abided by. If you don't like those rules, don't work for Tesla.

 

[PilotPete]

Former President Lincoln had to deal with the Constitution as it was written and believed in some of the more atrocious things our founding fathers believed in (slavery and the degradation of women).

I will respectfully disagree with you on this. An in-depth study of the history of the constitution shows the split between the authors of the constitution, and some of the states on the issue of slavery. The constitution was desired by the founders to be anti-slavery, but they feared some states wouldn’t ratify, so they just threw in hints of their intent.The final document was a compromise to get all the states to ratify. The founding fathers weren’t interested in the degradation of women. It was a view held by almost all that different genders had different roles in the world. This was taught in large part by the Catholic Church, and adopted by the Church of England when they split. Many religions today still hold that view.

There are many things in our past for which we cannot be proud. But the core intent of the founding of the country has far more good to it than bad. And the founding fathers cannot and should not be judged based on today’s principles. Nor should we today be judged based on yesterday’s or tomorrow’s principles. Just in the same way we don’t criticize doctors 250 years ago for not believing what we do today. And 250 years from now, they will look back on our beliefs the same way.

 

[AlDente]

What I want to know is:

if they're already building Cybertrucks, then what is the Gigafactory extension project for??

Maybe phones?

 

[Chris9702L]

I will respectfully disagree with you on this. An in-depth study of the history of the constitution shows the split between the authors of the constitution, and some of the states on the issue of slavery. The constitution was desired by the founders to be anti-slavery, but they feared some states wouldn’t ratify, so they just threw in hints of their intent.The final document was a compromise to get all the states to ratify. The founding fathers weren’t interested in the degradation of women. It was a view held by almost all that different genders had different roles in lthe world. This was taught in large part by the Catholic Church, and adopted by the Church of England when they split. Many religions today still hold that view.

There are many things in our past for which we cannot be proud. But the core intent of the founding of the country has far more good to it than bad. And the founding fathers cannot and should not be judged based on today’s principles. Nor should we today be judged based on yesterday’s or tomorrow’s principles. Just in the same way we don’t criticize doctors 250 years ago for not believing what we do today. And 250 years from now, they will look back on our beliefs the same way.

I agree whole heartedly with Pete. You had to get 13 states to come to an agreement. One of the big sticking points was slavery. If they tried for that they would have never come to an agreement. You are foolish if you think we were founded in slavery.

 

[cvalue13]

robo/next gen cheapy

 

[greggertruck]

Fuck the rules.

Abraham Lincoln, 1869

Killer play, ask Mary

 

[jerhenderson]

Thankfully Tesla’s assembly plants aren’t max prisons

notice all those QR codes on the Tesla parts?

internal scanners can read QR codes.....

 

[cvalue13]

internal scanners can read QR codes.....

best part no part?

 

[jerhenderson]

best part no part?

yup

 

[Crissa]

You are foolish if you think we were founded in slavery.

This seems very political, but... We were. The capitol was built with slave labor. Denying it seems insulting.

Luckily, when we fought a war over it, the people who didn't fight on the side of slavery won.

-Crissa

 

[jerhenderson]

I agree whole heartedly with Pete. You had to get 13 states to come to an agreement. One of the big sticking points was slavery. If they tried for that they would have never come to an agreement. You are foolish if you think we were founded in slavery.

the southern economy was based on it and the northern economy did business with it. Denying it only reveals lack of knowledge, at best.

 

[jerhenderson]

I will respectfully disagree with you on this. An in-depth study of the history of the constitution shows the split between the authors of the constitution, and some of the states on the issue of slavery. The constitution was desired by the founders to be anti-slavery, but they feared some states wouldn’t ratify, so they just threw in hints of their intent.The final document was a compromise to get all the states to ratify. The founding fathers weren’t interested in the degradation of women. It was a view held by almost all that different genders had different roles in the world. This was taught in large part by the Catholic Church, and adopted by the Church of England when they split. Many religions today still hold that view.

There are many things in our past for which we cannot be proud. But the core intent of the founding of the country has far more good to it than bad. And the founding fathers cannot and should not be judged based on today’s principles. Nor should we today be judged based on yesterday’s or tomorrow’s principles. Just in the same way we don’t criticize doctors 250 years ago for not believing what we do today. And 250 years from now, they will look back on our beliefs the same way.

regarding the degradation of women, ummm yes it was a patriarchal system, not as severe as the modern Afghanistan but still built around women as second class citizens, only baby machines. but we digress from the topic in this site.

 

[Gurule92]

All my threads are spiraling! Lol

Sponsored