TESLA SHOULD CANCEL THE CYBERTRUCK

biovmrct22

Member
First Name
Vincent
Joined
Oct 26, 2020
Threads
0
Messages
5
Reaction score
10
Location
Niceville, FL
Vehicles
Honda Fit, Hyundai Sonata, Ford Explorer SportTrac, Tesla Cybertruck (Pending)
Occupation
Retired
Country flag
TESLA SHOULD CANCEL THE CYBERTRUCK
The Competition Has Already Beaten The EV To The Market, With Better Products
by
016da04b27ca49e7fabde8f58372f866?s=40&d=mm&r=g.png
Manoli Katakis October 18, 2021, 4:03 pm

Tesla-Cybertruck-Front.jpg

Image via Tesla

Tesla has given the auto industry establishment a lot to worry about. Here are a few examples: a complete rethinking of how to sell a car, with no franchised dealerships; the ability to keep the vehicle’s software fresh through OTA updates; semi-autonomous driving; wild stock prices. The irreverent nature of Tesla has favorably disrupted the auto industry, causing a shakeup in how business is done, period. It’s had just about every large global automaker biting on the bait. But the Cybertruck continues to be a joke. And as the clock continues to tick forward, there’s really no reason for the automaker to continue committing to an inferior product, compared to three vehicles that have emerged as frontrunners to take it on. Vehicles that have already started to get in the hands of customers.

Rivian-R1T-Water-Test-1024x576.jpg

Image via RivianRivian R1T

Perhaps the biggest threat to Tesla comes from well-funded EV automaker Rivian. A new-age automaker that took its time ironing out its inaugural productsbefore getting them into the hands of customers, the Rivian R1T has proven to be more than competent in extreme conditions, validating its 800 hp and 900 lb-ft of torque by entering off-road events like the Rebelle Rally, and crossing the Trans-America trail. Where is Tesla in validating the Cybertruck, two years after revealing it?

When it comes to the awareness of Rivian and its products, that’s probably where Tesla still has the Michigan-turned-California automaker beat. But that’s probably because Rivian founder and CEO RJ Scaringe hasn’t been on The Joe Rogan Experience. Or Cathie Wood decreeing absurd share price targets for the automaker on CNBC (yet). But delivering on product promises, on time, is also why a car company is so much more than a cult of personality.

GMC-Hummer-EV.jpg
Image via GMC.GMC Hummer EV

GM has made a big splash by resurrecting the Hummer name, and its macho proportions and radical power numbers (1,000 hp!) have the electric pickup truck putting off quite the vibe. The truck is also set to begin production by the end of the year, just behind the Rivian R1T, and seemingly well ahead of the Tesla Cybertuck.

And this new Hummer EV isn’t some badge-engineered compliance car, either. It shares zero parts with any existing General Motors vehicle. And, when you watch the Hummer EV do its Crabwalk dance in person, there’s no denying that the electric truck is pretty damn cool. Cool enough to where even Tesla CEO Elon Musk admitted to rethinking the design of the Cybertruck, which would incorporate rear wheel steering, at minimum.

Vehicle-Center-F-150-Lightning-Assembly-2-1024x682.jpg

Image via Ford

.Ford F-150 Lightning

Where the GMC Hummer EV and Rivian R1T seem more positioned to stand out in a crowd, the all-electric Ford F-150 Lightning gets things down to brass tacks. For its part, Ford Motor Company has gone as far as to admit that Tesla is the catalyst for its EV push, but has focused its market positioning of the F-150 Lightning truck as one that’s built to work, and what it can do on the job site. Stats like being able to power a house for three days, or that it stands to be the most affordable electric pickup truck on the market when it launches in early 2022, are helping the electric truck garner the attention of fleet buyers, with enough reservation deposits to motivate Ford to double its production targets next year. And, for better or worse, President Biden drove one.

While the Ford F-150 Lightning may not have the thick stainless steel body that the Tesla Cybertruck may have, Tesla lacks the decades of learning and customer data on people who use their trucks for work, which Ford has in spades.

Tesla-Cybertruck-at-Gigafactory.jpg
Image via Twitter

.How Much Of The Tesla Cybertruck Was Just A Cash Grab?

As of this writing, customers that have put down a Tesla Cybertruck reservation deposit have not been notified that the vehicle has been or will be canceled, so the interest-free loan generated from reservation holders remains in circulation. But with the automaker pulling the original specs and pricing of the Cybertruck from its website recently (despite still accepting reservations), something appears off. And since Tesla has decided to eliminate its communications department a while ago, we’re left drawing our own conclusions.

Will Tesla ask reservation holders to go for something else? Perhaps only if a Cybertruck 2.0 doesn’t reveal itself. But like the new Tesla Roadster, the Cybertruck seems to have been demoted from industry disruptor, to yet another simple fan-boy fantasy.

Tesla-Cybertruck-Interior-1024x576.jpg

Image via Tesla

“Better Products” From The Competition

The genuine flaws of the Tesla Cybertruck appear to be that it takes in zero account of any pragmatic use. Although, the Cybertruck is an incredible exercise in designing a vehicle that can circumvent just about every single transportation law in the DOT’s sizable rulebook.

Because of its gross vehicle weight rating putting it in the Class 2B category, it does not require the following:
  • airbags
  • a shape optimized for pedestrian safety
  • a crumple zone for crash safety
  • NHTSA crash testing
  • EPA electric range testing
Other vehicles like the Hummer EV and Rivian R1T may be classified in the same gross vehicle weight category, but GM and Rivian at least know better to implement these safety features into the design of their electric trucks, regardless the regulatory framework. It’s just good business practice, as the product would appear unfinished otherwise.

Add to it that the Cybertruck body is stainless steel, Tesla could save well into nine figures by simply forgoing any need to paint it over its lifecycle. This is based off what traditional OEMs have been seen investing over time just on paint tooling alone.

All in all, the Tesla Cybertruck would cost a fraction to build in comparison to what General Motors and Ford have earmarked for tooling and engineering of its upcoming electric vehicle offerings. See investments at the GM Factory Zero and Spring Hill plants, as well as Ford’s recent Kentucky and Rouge Complex announcements. To that end, the Tesla Cybertruck deserves incredible praise, and similar techniques should be applied where appropriate across the industry. But beyond this, the Cybertruck feels like an inferior product compared to its rivals as it stands, which bring more functionality and thought-out touches to the table. To the point where I’m not sure why anybody would want one, beyond the clout.

Cybertruck-vs-Ford-F-150-Truck-Pull-Video-1024x466.jpg


Was The Tesla Cybertruck A Ruse?

Telsa revealed the hulking Cybertruck thinking what, exactly? That a bunch of Bay Area sociopaths are going to suddenly trade in their Model 3 and master parallel parking a Class 2B pickup truck next to a tent colony? That the Texas brodozer crowd is going to suddenly trade in lifted diesel trucks for something that can’t roll coal? Are coastal elites going to behave poorly on Twitter when it doesn’t fit in a parking garage, or there’s nowhere to charge one?

It’s one thing to put a refundable $100 deposit down for kicks. It’s another to live with such an automobile.

Somewhere between November of 2019 and now, the Tesla Cybertruck as it is has stopped making sense. And based on what we’re seeing from GM, Ford and Rivian, it’s time for Elon Musk and company to go back to formula. That’s not to say that Tesla shouldn’t or can’t build a truck. Or that people wouldn’t buy a Tesla truck. It just should be a good one.


Tesla-Cybertruck-1024x576.jpg

Image via Tesla

Written by Manoli Katakis
Detroit Region SCCA Member and founder of MC&T. Automotive Media Jedi Knight. Not yet the rank of Master.

https://www.musclecarsandtrucks.com/tesla-should-cancel-the-cybertruck/
This article will not age well. The internet has a very long memory.
Sponsored

 

Richard V.

Well-known member
First Name
Richard
Joined
Oct 12, 2021
Threads
55
Messages
399
Reaction score
396
Location
Quebec
Vehicles
Chevy Volt 2015
Occupation
Retired
Country flag
Super unprofessional of the author to reply like that. Doubly so the follow up.

Of course looking at the seriously low-budget/ poorly researched piece it’s not surprising.
I agree Dennis, I am not very impressed with the article and the attitude the author has. Very bias...
 


Richard V.

Well-known member
First Name
Richard
Joined
Oct 12, 2021
Threads
55
Messages
399
Reaction score
396
Location
Quebec
Vehicles
Chevy Volt 2015
Occupation
Retired
Country flag
Objectivity is not Manoli Katakis forte.

You people ?
A quick Google and no wonder about this person's Tesla and Cybertruck views. This is what he does "Detroit Region SCCA member, ... founder of http://MuscleCarsAndTrucks.com. Automotive Media Jedi Knight - not yet a Master."

Not exactly a good fit for this Tesla CT club ... I would not call myself a CT owners' yet :), but I believe I will.
 
Last edited:

Crissa

Well-known member
First Name
Crissa
Joined
Jul 8, 2020
Threads
127
Messages
16,608
Reaction score
27,654
Location
Santa Cruz
Vehicles
2014 Zero S, 2013 Mazda 3
Country flag
CT BEV Design
Yes
CT is a total re design of the so called truck. CT is not a truck it is more like a El Camino a car / truck with the best BEV design under the hood
Ford gm Chrysler are all building ICE trucks with the gas tanks removed and a few electric motors shoved in.
Problem
These ICE companies are not Truck or car design companies and spend no or very little on R&D. ICE money go to ads and PR not car design and you can not build BEVs without dumping $ Billions in BEV design.
Truth
Ford gm and Chrysler can not build BEV cars or trucks where Tesla can and will.
It is better for Tesla CT to come out and Ford gm and Chrysler copy a winner and clone the CT than to let ICE companies rip out gas tanks and shove in electric motors.
The El Camino was a truck. You could use it haul stuff, have campers; it's only real limit was weight and clearance, not all trucks go into rough terrain. It did gravel roads fine. (My dad had a Ranchero for awhile.) But the Cybertruck will be able to be low or high as needed, on the fly. It'll be more of a truck than the old ICE conversions, at least the new design.

-Crissa
 

Ogre

Well-known member
First Name
Dennis
Joined
Jul 3, 2021
Threads
164
Messages
10,719
Reaction score
26,998
Location
Ogregon
Vehicles
Model Y
Country flag
Ford gm and Chrysler can not build BEV cars or trucks where Tesla can and will.
It is better for Tesla CT to come out and Ford gm and Chrysler copy a winner and clone the CT than to let ICE companies rip out gas tanks and shove in electric motors.
I think it’s way too early to discount GM and Ford. I tend to agree with you in general, they aren’t spending enough, and they are way too late to this party, but they may still pull a rabbit out of their hats. They also have the support of the government which is apparently still willing to gift them with lopsided subsidies. I guess that’s the benefit of having your HQ in battleground states.

Stellantis/ Ram a lot of people seem to think is good at coming late and impressing people. Personally, I don’t think this is a market where you can swoop in late and succeed so I think their chances are pretty low. They can’t swoop in in the 11th hour and secure thousands of tons of nickel and lithium to supply batteries for their last minute fleet.

VW is interesting. They seem most likely to turn their ship. Maybe we’ll see a VW van-truck again eventually.
 

Bill906

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 21, 2020
Threads
4
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
3,229
Location
Wisconsin
Vehicles
Jeep
Country flag
I think it’s way too early to discount GM and Ford. I tend to agree with you in general, they aren’t spending enough, and they are way too late to this party, but they may still pull a rabbit out of their hats. They also have the support of the government which is apparently still willing to gift them with lopsided subsidies. I guess that’s the benefit of having your HQ in battleground states.

Stellantis/ Ram a lot of people seem to think is good at coming late and impressing people. Personally, I don’t think this is a market where you can swoop in late and succeed so I think their chances are pretty low. They can’t swoop in in the 11th hour and secure thousands of tons of nickel and lithium to supply batteries for their last minute fleet.

VW is interesting. They seem most likely to turn their ship. Maybe we’ll see a VW van-truck again eventually.
I could see Stellantis swoop in if the circumstances change just right. For example, If Tesla, Ford, GM etc. All jump in and get heavily invested in Lithium batteries and all of the sudden a breakthrough in battery technology happens (solid state for example.) Stellantis wouldn't be tied to the old technology and might be able to pull ahead. Kind of like how Tesla currently has the advantage of not being bogged down with ICE technology.
 

Ogre

Well-known member
First Name
Dennis
Joined
Jul 3, 2021
Threads
164
Messages
10,719
Reaction score
26,998
Location
Ogregon
Vehicles
Model Y
Country flag
I could see Stellantis swoop in if the circumstances change just right. For example, If Tesla, Ford, GM etc. All jump in and get heavily invested in Lithium batteries and all of the sudden a breakthrough in battery technology happens (solid state for example.) Stellantis wouldn't be tied to the old technology and might be able to pull ahead. Kind of like how Tesla currently has the advantage of not being bogged down with ICE technology.
Yes… Stellantis, Honda, or Toyota could discover they’ve had the Holy Grail of transportation in their basement all along.

Who knows, if you believe the conspiracy theories, these companies have been suppressing EVs for decades sitting on a trove of secret tech so they could prop up their profitable ICE platforms.
 


Huntsman

Well-known member
First Name
Kevin
Joined
Dec 22, 2019
Threads
6
Messages
195
Reaction score
327
Location
Alabama, U.S.A.
Vehicles
F150
Occupation
Heavy Equipment Ops
Country flag
Somewhere I read mirrors were required in the days when motorized vehicles roamed the roads with horse and buggies. The mirror started on the buggy to watch for over taking motor cars and the regulation required them on motor cars for the same reason, when being over taken. Motor car owners thought they should only be on buggies as a matter of common sense so they were not required on motor cars but had to be offered. Manufacturers simply installed them in order to avoid controversy and allow a rear view for faster cars approaching.
 

Huntsman

Well-known member
First Name
Kevin
Joined
Dec 22, 2019
Threads
6
Messages
195
Reaction score
327
Location
Alabama, U.S.A.
Vehicles
F150
Occupation
Heavy Equipment Ops
Country flag
TESLA SHOULD CANCEL THE CYBERTRUCK
The Competition Has Already Beaten The EV To The Market, With Better Products
by
016da04b27ca49e7fabde8f58372f866?s=40&d=mm&r=g.png
Manoli Katakis October 18, 2021, 4:03 pm

I don’t agree with most of that but I was wowed by the new GMC hands free commercial. It‘s old technology as compared to Tesla but with the music, you gotta admit, well marketed. And I think that’s the point of this Detroit writer, it’s all about marketing. Nobody has a thing on Tesla with regard to EV’s. All the cubbies and work stations are novel, but Elon has addressed the issues truck, TRUCK owners are interested in (less the 8’ vault).
 
 




Top